Predicting at-risk students in general chemistry: comparing formal thought to a general achievement measure

By Scott E. Lewis, J. Lewis. 2007

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea650a8929b5b8a79ec7f0a4cfa5319b842e9d2c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Xiaoying Xu
2. J. Lewis

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Xiaoying Xu
2. Jenine R. Maeyer
3. V. Talanquer
4. J. Lewis

In Education

1. Xiaoying Xu
2. Jenine R. Maeyer
3. V. Talanquer
4. J. Lewis

Citations in the corpus

• The role of intuitive heuristics in students' thinking: Ranking chemical substances (2010, background): “…shows that formal reasoning and mathematics skills have a strong impact on students’ understanding and success in solving chemistry problems (Lewis & Lewis, 2007; Tai, Sadler, & Loehr, 2005), a visual aid was included in the answer sheet to indicate where to place those substances with the…”
• Refinement of a Chemistry Attitude Measure for College Students. (2011, methodology): “Previous ability was measured by the quantitative portion of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SATM), which has been used to predict the first year chemistry achievement (Scott E. Lewis & Lewis, 2007).”