Generational Differences in Work-Related Attitudes: A Meta-analysis
By David P. Costanza, Jessica M. Badger, R. Fraser, Jamie B. Severt, P. Gade. Journal of business and psychology, 2012
556 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Life-span and Life-course Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fefee6303cda28a79025964cce6101d864d757b6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Life-span and Life-course Studies
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Generationally Based Differences in the Workplace: Is There a There There? (2015, background): “In theirmeta-analysis, Costanza et al. (2012) concluded, “where generational differences do exist on work-related outcomes, they are relatively small and the inconsistent pattern of results does not support the hypothesis of systematic differences” (p. 391).”
- Leadership and generations at work: A critical review (2017, background): “There is a twofold irony to this observation: on the one hand, research has generally yielded equivocal results regarding the impact of generational differences on work outcomes (Costanza et al., 2012).”
- One job, one deal…or not: do generations respond differently to psychological contract fulfillment? (2016, background): “Although more empirical evidence of generational differences in the workplace is being published, findings as well as topics of study still vary widely (Costanza et al. 2012; Parry and Irwin 2011).”
- The Millennial Generation (2017, background): “Indeed, most studies define generation as a group whose members share a common experience and an awareness of the distinctiveness of their own age cohort vis-à-vis others (Costanza et al., 2012; Parry & Urwin, 2011).”