Mass-Communicated Prediction Requests: Practical Application and a Cognitive Dissonance Explanation for Self-Prophecy
By Eric R. Spangenberg, David E. Sprott, Bianca Grohmann, Ronn J. Smith. 2003
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb65c2dcebe860e4846f1e07827d51e1635e23a0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Safety Research
In Sociology and Political Science
- Vicki G. Morwitz
- Gavan J. Fitzsimons
- Lauren G. Block
- Patti Y. Williams
- Pierre Chandon
- W. Reinartz
- Y. “. Kim
- David E. Sprott
Citations in the corpus
- The question–behavior effect: What we know and where we go from here (2006, background): “This has been supported with recent research (Spangenberg et al., 2003) suggesting that such masscommunicated questioning can be effective in inducing the question– behavior effect in larger populations.”
- Application of the Cognitive Dissonance Theory to the Service Industry (2011, background): “For example, the role of cognitive dissonance was examined following the act of choosing between a set of alternatives (postpurchase dissonance), following an induced act that was against one's values (induced compliance situation—being forced to make a positive comment despite the negative view), a”
- Do Intentions Really Predict Behavior? Self-Generated Validity Effects in Survey Research (2005, background): “In a related stream of research, studies show that asking consumers to predict their future behavior influences the likelihood that they will engage in that behavior (Sherman 1980; Spangenberg 1997; Spangenberg and Greenwald 1999; Sprott et al. 2003).”
- Simply asking questions about health behaviors increases both healthy and unhealthy behaviors (2006, methodology): “Some evidence has demonstrated that asking questions about health behaviors can indeed lead to changes in actual behavior, despite presumably higher levels of vigilance in this domain (eg, Spangenberg, 1997 ; Spangenberg, Sprott, Grohmann, & Smith, 2003 ; Sprott, Smith, Spangenberg, & Freson, 200”