Passivity-Based Control of Multi-Agent Systems
By Nikhil Chopra, Mark W. Spong. 2006
425 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa0a57831144a873f8b8c1e97317c7522a3588db
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Wei Ren
- Frank L. Lewis
- Gang Chen
- Abdelkader Abdessameud
- Abdelhamid Tayebi
- Yu-Ping Tian
- Soon-Jo Chung
- Abhijit Das
Citations in the corpus
- Cooperative adaptive control for synchronization of second‐order systems with unknown nonlinearities (2011, background): “Leaderless or uncontrolled synchronization with nonlinear non-identical passive systems is reported in [24], which provided a Lyapunov proof valid for balanced graph structures.”
- Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems With Diverse Input and Communication Delays (2008, methodology): “Recently, these kinds of consensus protocols have been studied for fixed or even switched graphs by using different analysis methods, such as the contraction analysis method [13], the passivity-based method [4], the method based on delayed and hierarchical graphs [3], among others.”
- Distributed leaderless consensus algorithms for networked Euler–Lagrange systems (2009, methodology): “To use the passivity property, the control law on synchronisation of Euler–Lagrange systems derived in Chopra and Spong (2006) is model dependent in the sense that it requires the knowledge of the inertial matrix and the Coriolis and centrifugal torques.”
- Technical communique: Consensus of second-order discrete-time multi-agent systems with nonuniform time-delays and dynamically changing topologies (2009, neutral): “Compared with Chopra and Spong (2006), Hong et al. (2008), Lafferriere et al. (2005), Liu and Passino (2006), Ren and Beard (2008), Shi et al. (2006), the most important feature of the results obtained in this paper is that we do not impose restrictive conditions on the communication topologies and…”
- Delay robustness in consensus problems (2010, methodology): “Transmission delays for MAS consensus have been investigatedpreviously for example in Cao et al. (2008), Chopra and Spong (2006), Chopra et al. (2008), Lee and Spong (2006), Münz et al. (2008, 2009a), Papachristodoulou et al. (in press), Xiao and Wang (2008a) and Yang et al. (2008).”
- Cooperative Robot Control and Concurrent Synchronization of Lagrangian Systems (2007, background): “In particular, it shall be shown that our proposed control law generalizes the robot control law presented in [4], while our convergence result is stronger (exponential).”
- Synchronization of bilateral teleoperators with time delay (2008, positive): “Synchronization-based approaches for robot control have been developed in Chopra and Spong (2006, 2005) and RodriguezAngeles and Nijmeijer (2004) and the application of synchronization to bilateral teleoperation has been demonstrated in Chopra and Spong (2005). In this paper we view the problem of b”
- Robust Consensus Controller Design for Nonlinear Relative Degree Two Multi-Agent Systems With Communication Constraints (2011, background): “Consensus conditions for higher order nonlinear MAS with relative degree one and heterogeneous communication delays have been given in [2], [29].”
- Formation control of VTOL Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with communication delays (2011, methodology): “In this context, the work of Chopra and Spong (2006) presents an output synchronization scheme for passive nonlinear systems with nonlinear coupling.”
- Distributed Adaptive Tracking Control for Synchronization of Unknown Networked Lagrangian Systems (2011, methodology): “In contrast to the passivity-based approach [6], the proposed approach does not depend on the passivity property, the balanced graph, and the dynamic model.”
- Distributed adaptive control for synchronization of unknown nonlinear networked systems (2010, background): “Synchronization of nonlinear passive dynamical systems has been studied by Chopra and Spong (2006).”