DEVELOPMENT OF A GLOBAL MEASURE OF PERSONALITY

By Mark J. Schmit, Jenifer A. Kihm, C. Robie. 2000

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9d3779ea9258e80a2b982c67138192ed9c24932

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. T. Judge
2. Jonathan A. Shaffer
3. Philip L. Roth
4. M. K. Mount
5. Murray R. Barrick
6. A. Hirschi
7. J. Kammeyer-Mueller
8. Adam M. Grant

In Clinical Psychology

1. T. Judge
2. Murray R. Barrick
3. M. K. Mount
4. Bennett E. Postlethwaite
5. Jonathan A. Shaffer
6. Philip L. Roth
7. Mark I. H. Hwang
8. Cheng-Liang Yang

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. T. Judge
2. M. K. Mount
3. Murray R. Barrick
4. Jonathan A. Shaffer
5. Bennett E. Postlethwaite
6. R. Ilies
7. H. Zacher
8. N. Betz

Citations in the corpus

• Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? (2001, background): “In particular, Schmidt and Hunter (1999) believe that researchers have failed to account for transient error, which results from moods, feelings and mental states on a specific occasion, as an important source of variation in measures of constructs.”
• Personality traits and simultaneous reciprocal influences between job performance and job satisfaction (2014, background): “Particularly, extraversion is significantly related to management job performance (Barrick and Mount, 1993; Schmit et al., 2000).”
• Uncovering Faking Samples in Applicant, Incumbent, and Experimental Data Sets: An Application of Mixed-Model Item Response Theory (2004, unknown): “analysis of Viswesvaran and Ones (1999). For the ABLE data scales (see Table 2), the honest condition always had lower means compared to the ad-lib condition, which in turn was always lower than the coached faking condition.”
• A Meta‐Analysis of Achievement Motivation Differences between Entrepreneurs and Managers** (2007, background): “Other potentially valuable instruments include the Personal Characteristics Inventory (cf. Mount, Barrick, and Strauss 1999) and the Global Personality Inventory (Schmit, Kihm, and Robie 2000).”
• A matter of context: A meta‐analytic investigation of the relative validity of contextualized and noncontextualized personality measures. (2012, background): “For example, consider the following sample items taken from noncontextualized Conscientiousness scales: “[I] am exacting in my work” (Goldberg, 1999); “At times I have trouble making myself concentrate on my work” (Schmit et al., 2000).”