Uncovering Faking Samples in Applicant, Incumbent, and Experimental Data Sets: An Application of Mixed-Model Item Response Theory

By Michael J. Zickar, Robert E. Gibby, C. Robie. 2004

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0bbf44d7e6aaf1d9f055d55aeecd8ca51bb0a4bc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. R. Goffin
2. Mitchell G. Rothstein
3. H. van der Flier
4. Annette M. Maij-de Meij
5. Douglas J. Brown
6. H. Kelderman
7. James C. Beaty
8. C. Robie

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. R. Goffin
2. Mitchell G. Rothstein
3. H. van der Flier
4. Annette M. Maij-de Meij
5. Douglas J. Brown
6. H. Kelderman
7. James C. Beaty
8. C. Robie

In Statistics and Probability

1. Mitchell G. Rothstein
2. R. Goffin
3. H. van der Flier
4. Annette M. Maij-de Meij
5. Douglas J. Brown
6. H. Kelderman
7. James C. Beaty
8. C. Robie

Citations in the corpus

• Do people fake on personality inventories? A verbal protocol analysis (2007, methodology): “This more direct evidence of classbased faking motivation is consistent with less direct evidence provided by Zickar et al. (2004) .”
• Fitting a Mixture Item Response Theory Model to Personality Questionnaire Data: Characterizing Latent Classes and Investigating Possibilities for Improving Prediction (2008, methodology): “Zickar, Gibby, and Robie (2004) applied the mixed Rasch model to uncover faking subgroups among a sample of applicants and incumbents.”
• The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support? (2006, methodology): “Second, as discussed in the Faking detection section, IRT opens up new possibilities in the detection of faking (e.g., Zickar et al., 2004; Zickar & Robie, 1999).”