Voluntary SOCIAL DISCLOSURES by Large UK Companies

By Stephen Brammer, Stephen. Pavelin. 2004

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9bb1e1b457ea3f4105b33389e06a7888174ef3a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Ann Buchholtz
2. K. Shabana
3. A. Carroll
4. T. Soobaroyen
5. Saverio Bozzolan
6. J. Mahadeo
7. vanisha Oogarah-Hanuman
8. Michele Fabrizi

In Strategy and Management

1. A. Carroll
2. K. Shabana
3. Ann Buchholtz
4. T. Soobaroyen
5. Saverio Bozzolan
6. Cedric E. Dawkins
7. F. Ngunjiri
8. J. Mahadeo

Citations in the corpus

• Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the Internet (2009, unknown): “That there are sector differences in CSR orientation and reporting is also well documented (Banerjee, 2002; Brammer and Pavelin, 2004; Branco and Rodrigues, 2008; Jose and Lee, 2007; Patten, 1991) and a variety of possible drivers are suspected including established environmental sensitivity and…”
• How Does the Market Value Corporate Sustainability Performance? (2011, unknown): “Large companies, on average, are more diversified across geographical and product markets which means that they have larger and more diverse stakeholder groups (Brammer and Pavelin 2004).”
• CSR Communication: An Impression Management Perspective (2014, methodology): “An emerging stream of research examines how organizations use communication and projected images to highlight their commitment to CSR (e.g., Brammer and Pavellin 2004; Dawkins and Ngunjiri 2008; Highhouse et al. 2009; Hooghiemstra 2000; Zadek et al. 1997).”
• The Institutionalization of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (2017, background): “Business exposure drives voluntary disclosure because higher levels of it intensify the social pressures on the firm (Brammer & Pavelin, 2004; Cormier & Magnan, 2003; Hackston & Milne, 1996).”
• A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Social Disclosures in a Developing Economy (2011, background): “ Brammer and Pavelin 2004; Branco and Rodrigues 2008).”
• The Role of CEO’s Personal Incentives in Driving Corporate Social Responsibility (2014, methodology): “This approach is commonly used in papers relying on EIRIS data (see Brammer and Pavelin, 2004; Cox et al., 2004; Brammer et al., 2006; Brammer and Pavelin, 2006; Cox et al., 2007).”
• The Creation of Value Through Corporate Reputation (2007, background): “…with the process of generating reputation or social prestige, which companies obtain through the policies or strategies regarding CSR that they pursue (Brammer and Pavelin, 2004; Fombrun and Shanley, 1990; Toms, 2002), those that analyse to what extent reputation co-incides on the financial…”
• Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in South Africa (2008, background): “Accordingly, companies develop a general posture toward disclosure (Lang & Lundholm, 1993) such that participation in one form of voluntary social disclosure leads to participation in others (Brammer & Pavelin, 2004).”
• Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Quality: International Evidence (2015, methodology): “…and Cox et al. (2004) on the multidimensional nature of CSR, we make use of an aggregate CSR measure that takes into consideration a range of important issues across companies and three constituent constructs that reflect specific dimensions of the overall CSR measure (Brammer & Pavelin, 2004).”