The Effectiveness of Second Language Pronunciation Instruction: A Meta-analysis

361 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Corpus Use in Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis. (2017, background): “There might be a tendency for effect sizes to increase over time as researchers focus on the most promising questions (Lee, Jang, & Plonsky, 2015) or conversely to decrease in a Proteus effect (Plonsky & Oswald, 2014) whereby they regress toward the mean as research becomes more nuanced concerning…”
The Effectiveness of L2 Pronunciation Instruction: A Narrative Review (2015, background): “We were asked to base our review on the list provided to us, and thus cannot comment on criteria for inclusion or exclusion of particular studies (Lee et al. 2015).”
Differential effects of instruction on the development of second language comprehensibility, word stress, rhythm, and intonation: The case of inexperienced Japanese EFL learners (2017, background): “Future research should overcome this issue by including extemporaneous speech samples which are representative of natural speech (Lee et al., 2015).”
Effects of Second Language Pronunciation Teaching Revisited: A Proposed Measurement Framework and Meta‐Analysis (2019, methodology): “Among a range of moderator analyses, Lee et al.’s (2015) meta-analysis took a first step towards examining the relative effectiveness of pronunciation instruction according to two broad categories of outcome measures—more”