The Internationalization of Chinese Family Enterprises and Dunning's Eclectic MNE Paradigm

By C. Erdener, Daniel M. Shapiro. Management and Organization Review, 2005

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f90c4e23f5953b75e693b6336fd7ecb61c7d7e7b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Thilo Pukall
2. Andrea Calabro
3. Antonio Duréndez
4. Xiongwen Lu
5. Emma García‐Meca
6. M. Ramón-Llorens
7. J. Child
8. Lihua Wang

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Thilo Pukall
2. Xiongwen Lu
3. Emma García‐Meca
4. J. Child
5. C. Jones
6. Shaomin Li
7. Max Boisot
8. Peter J. Buckley

In Strategy and Management

1. Peter J. Buckley
2. Peter Ping Li
3. Ilan Alon
4. Hinrich Voss
5. J. Child
6. Shaomin Li
7. C. Jones
8. Ping Deng

Citations in the corpus

• Which Way through the Open Door? Reflections on the Internationalization of Chinese Firms (2008, background): “And if not, would we be better off seeking a more ‘China specific’ theory to account for the particular facts of the Chinese case, or should we rather be aiming for a more comprehensive rethinking of our existing theories (Erdener & Shapiro, 2005)?”
• International business research and risky investments, an analysis of FDI in conflict zones (2013, background): “Second, formal membership of corporate groups and informal networks facilitates access to internal capital markets, which makes it easier to raise the funding necessary for overseas expansion (Tasi, 2002; Child and Pleister, 2003; Liu, 2005; Erdener and Shapiro, 2005).”
• The Internationalization of Family Firms (2014, methodology): “Some articles have no clear definition of what constitutes a family firm for their analysis (e.g., Erdener & Shapiro, 2005; Yeung, 2000), but this is partially explained by the research questions and methods applied, as some types of case studies or conceptual papers do not demand an ultimate…”
• The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment (2007, background): “The latter advantage, which some term a relational asset (Dunning, 2002; Erdener and Shapiro, 2005), may be revealed as networking skills and may be linked to the Chinese diaspora in the case of Chinese firms.”
• Toward an integrated theory of multinational evolution: The evidence of Chinese multinational enterprises as latecomers (2007, background): “For instance, a recent study of the internationalization of the Chinese family enterprises (Erdener and Shapiro, 2005) finds that these firms emphasize social or relational mode to control their foreign operations, and their unique ownership advantages derive from their social or relational capital.”
• Influence of CEO characteristics in family firms internationalization (2017, background): “…appropriate form of entering into a new international market by taking into account their ownership (O), location (L), and internalization (I) advantages (OLI), which are competitive advantages that the firm may possess (Porter, 1980) and that can enhance its performance (Erdener & Shapiro, 2005).”
• Outward internationalization of private enterprises in China: The effect of competitive advantages and disadvantages compared to home market rivals (2012, background): “There also has been evidence that the mainstream perspective should apply in the transitional economy (Erdener & Shapiro, 2005).”
• Globalization of Chinese Firms Theoretical Universalism or Particularism (2011, background): “The third and final article in this issue by Liu, Lin, and Cheng (2011) investigates the role of family ownership in international involvement of Taiwanese firms, building on the Dunning OLI framework and Erdener and Shapiro’s (2005) application of OLI to Chinese family businesses.”