Emma García‐Meca

Accounting · 2005–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 17 papers; trusts 102 researchers and is trusted by 27 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Accounting — 453 citations into it; #1,257 of 8,970 by trust here, #981 by citations
• Strategy and Management — 237 citations into it; #1,637 of 10,874 by trust here, #1,402 by citations
• Finance — 98 citations into it; #6,542 of 10,518 by trust here, #7,251 by citations
• Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management — 83 citations into it; #6,869 of 8,741 by trust here, #5,113 by citations
• Economics and Econometrics — 75 citations into it
• Marketing — 25 citations into it
• Sociology and Political Science — 24 citations into it
• Information Systems and Management — 12 citations into it

Whom Emma García‐Meca trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. J. P. Sánchez‐Ballesta
2. J. Hunter
3. Mark Lipsey
4. D. Dalton
5. Gerald Chau
6. S. Williams
7. Frank L. Schmidt
8. Carla C. J. M. Millar
9. Ping-Sheng Koh
10. C. Daily

Who trusts Emma García‐Meca overall

1. John Dumay
2. Hichem Khlif
3. W. Ben‐Amar
4. Arnt Verriest
5. Linlin Cai
6. Lara Al-Haddad
7. Jing Li
8. Paolo Saona
9. J. P. Sánchez‐Ballesta
10. K. Hussainey

Papers from Emma García‐Meca's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Emma García‐Meca trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. PERFORMANCE MATCHED DISCRETIONARY ACCRUAL MEASURES
2. Earnings Management and Investor Protection: An International Comparison
3. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management
4. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure
5. CEO Incentives and Earnings Management
6. The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors
7. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?
8. Errors in Estimating Accruals: Implications for Empirical Research
9. A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure
10. EARNINGS QUALITY IN UK PRIVATE FIRMS: COMPARATIVE LOSS RECOGNITION TIMELINESS

Their papers

• Are narcissistic CEOs more tax aggressive? The moderating role of internal audit committees (2021) — 98 citations
• Internal corporate governance strength as a mechanism for achieving sustainable development goals (2020) — 124 citations
• Does corporate social responsibility affect tax avoidance: Evidence from family firms (2019) — 110 citations
• Gender diversity, financial expertise and its effects on accounting quality (2017) — 132 citations
• CSR Engagement and Earnings Quality in Banks. The Moderating Role of Institutional Factors (2017) — 132 citations
• Influence of CEO characteristics in family firms internationalization (2017) — 132 citations
• Board diversity and its effects on bank performance: An international analysis (2015) — 480 citations
• Does Corporate Governance Influence Earnings Management in Latin American Markets? (2014) — 443 citations
• Corporate Governance and Intellectual Capital Disclosure (2011) — 134 citations
• Board Effectiveness and Cost of Debt (2011) — 147 citations
• The Association of Board Independence and Ownership Concentration with Voluntary Disclosure: A Meta-analysis (2010) — 258 citations
• Corporate Governance and Earnings Management: A Meta‐Analysis (2009) — 389 citations
• Ownership Structure, Discretionary Accruals and the Informativeness of Earnings (2007) — 160 citations
• A Meta-Analytic Vision of the Effect of Ownership Structure on Firm Performance (2007) — 194 citations
• The use of intellectual capital information in investment decisions: An empirical study using analyst reports (2007) — 175 citations
• Assessing the quality of disclosure on intangibles in the Spanish capital market (2005) — 132 citations
• The explanatory factors of intellectual capital disclosure to financial analysts (2005) — 267 citations