Technical Adequacy of the Maze Task for Curriculum-Based Measurement of Reading Growth

By Jongho Shin, S. Deno, C. Espin. 2000

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Oral Reading and Maze Measures as Predictors of Success for English Learners on a State Standards Assessment (2005, methodology): “With the timed maze, students read a passage silently and circle the correct answer from each choice within a time limit (e.g., 3 minutes; Shin, Deno, & Espin, 2000 ).”
Using Curriculum-based Measurement to Establish Growth Standards for Students with Learning Disabilities (2001, methodology): “Although data bearing on maze growth standards were not presented in this article, research on the technical characteristics of the CBM maze has been reported (e.g., Shin et al., 2000).”
Literature Synthesis on Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading (2007, methodology): “For example, Shin, Deno, and Espin (2000) used Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) to examine growth rates on maze selection measures for second-grade students over the course of a year.”