The impact of instructional development in higher education: the state-of-the-art of the research

By A. Stes, M. Min-Leliveld, D. Gijbels, Peter Van Petegem. 2010

342 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Media Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f78e9ecc212e57804f3acb1206ed4d7f222ff8aa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Peter Van Petegem
2. Liesje Coertjens
3. Bart Rienties
4. Simon Lygo-Baker
5. A. Stes
6. Inge Hill
7. D. Parsons
8. Cheryl Amundsen

In Media Technology

1. Simon Lygo-Baker
2. Bart Rienties
3. Inge Hill
4. D. Parsons
5. Jane Holland
6. D. Willis
7. Peter Van Petegem
8. A. Stes

Citations in the corpus

• Are We Asking the Right Questions? (2012, background): “The most recent empirical review (Stes et al., 2010) was based on 36 identified articles; the review was not limited in terms of time (earliest article was 1977 and latest 2007) or source of publication, and the authors intentionally looked beyond peer-reviewed journals.”
• Impact of Teaching Development Programmes in Higher Education. HEA Research Series. (2012, background): “Others (D’Andrea and Gosling, 2005; Stes et al., 2010) have also noted that the emergence of discourse around learning and teaching is one of the more remarkable HE phenomena of the last decade.”
• Instructional development for teachers in higher education: impact on teaching approach (2010, background): “Thereby much insight could be gained from well-designed studies with a pre-test, a quasi-experimental character and/or using a mixed-method approach ( Stes et al. 2010 ).”
• The effects of online professional development on higher education teachers' beliefs and intentions towards learning facilitation and technology (2013, methodology): “In a meta-review of 36 (primarily US) studies in higher education, Stes et al. (2010) conclude that only three (out of 31 studies) measured the impact of professional development on teachers’ behaviour using a preand post-test method.”
• A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: A 10-year update: BEME Guide No. 40 (2016, background): “Since 2006, several reviews of faculty development designed to enhance teaching effectiveness have been published in higher education (e.g. Stes et al. 2010; Amundsen & Wilson 2012), dentistry (Hendricson et al. 2007), family medicine (Sorinola & Thistlethwaite 2013), and medical education (Leslie…”