Contextual epistemic development in science: A comparison of chemistry students and research chemists

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Understanding and Promoting Thinking About Knowledge (2016, methodology): “…including observations of the practices used, as well as of the discourse between people (e.g., Herrenkohl & Cornelius, 2013; Ryu & Sandoval, 2012; Samarapungavan et al., 2006), can be a powerful way to understand not only people’s epistemic cognition but also their perceptions of larger…”
Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and Psychology (2011, background): “Samarapungavan et al. (2006) found 6Measures of task importance by expectancy-value theorists have some similarities to epistemic value.”
More from the Horse’s Mouth: What scientists say about science as a social practice (2010, background): “More recently, Samarapungavan, Westby, and Bodner ( 2006 ) compared the NOS beliefs of 13 research chemists with those of chemistry students ranging from high school to postgraduate level.”