More from the Horse’s Mouth: What scientists say about science as a social practice

By Siu Ling Wong, D. Hodson. 2010

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This research study sought to identify prominent features of the nature of science (NOS) embedded in authentic scientific inquiry. Fourteen well‐established scientists from different parts of the world, working in experimental or theoretical research, in both traditional fields such as astrophysics and rapidly growing research fields such as molecular biology, participated as the informants of the study. The descriptions of their practices revealed eight prominent categories of NOS features. In an earlier paper of ours, we have reported four categories under the two themes: (1) the methods of scientific investigation and (2) the role and status of scientific knowledge. In this paper, we focus on the remaining four categories under the theme: social dimensions of science. Scientists’ descriptions of their practices have ‘put some flesh on the bones’ of the assertion that science is socially and culturally embedded. These descriptions also have considerable potential for development into interesting case studies as teaching resources to enhance and enrich students’ understanding of NOS.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42b47081459b9617dbe4b5b0c83a2f9cca413d82

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

  1. D. Hodson
  2. Stephen Bartos
  3. A. Antink
  4. Norman G. Lederman
  5. F. Abd‐El‐Khalick
  6. R. Khishfe
  7. Michael P. Clough
  8. Chin-Chung Tsai

In Education

  1. D. Hodson
  2. Stephen Bartos
  3. A. Antink
  4. Norman G. Lederman
  5. F. Abd‐El‐Khalick
  6. R. Khishfe
  7. Michael P. Clough
  8. Chin-Chung Tsai

Citations in the corpus