Deficits in phoneme segmentation are not the core problem of dyslexia: Evidence from German and English children.

By Karin Landerl, Heinz Wimmer. 2000

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5198942a12df3f087a33407807fc24ca0db5fea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Phonology, reading development, and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic perspective (2002, background): “Nevertheless, this cross-linguistic analysis suggests that a deficit in phonemic awareness per se cannot be a causal factor in developmental dyslexia across languages (see also Landerl & Wimmer (2000) .”
Orthographic Depth and Its Impact on Universal Predictors of Reading (2010, background): “The most worrisome concern is that English-based research might have overestimated the importance of phonological awareness in reading development (Landerl & Wimmer, 2000; Share, 2008).”
Longitudinal predictors of reading and spelling across languages varying in orthographic consistency (2012, background): “The majority of studies conducted in orthographically consistent languages have shown that phonological awareness either may not be an important predictor of reading (e.g., Aarnoutse, van Leeuwe, & Verhoeven, 2005; Babayig ˘it & Stainthorp, 2007; Silve ´n, Poskiparta, Niemi, & Voeten, 2007), or may ”
What do spelling errors tell us? Classification and analysis of errors made by Greek schoolchildren with and without dyslexia (2013, methodology): “In contrast, German children with dyslexia apparently do not exhibit persistent deficiencies in phonological spelling after the first few years of schooling (Landerl & Wimmer, 2000).”
Rapid naming speed and reading across languages that vary in orthographic consistency (2008, background): “This finding provides an explanation as to why some researchers have argued that RAN is more strongly related to reading in consistent orthographies, such as German, Italian, or Greek, compared to English (e.g., Di Filippo et al., 2005; Landerl & Wimmer, 2000; Mayringer et al., 1998; Nikolopoulos ”
Correlates of Reading Fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and Orthographic Factors (2005, background): “Although this finding provides counter evidence to the second hypothesis, it is supportive of recently emerging evidence demonstrating significant shrinkage in the power of phonemic awareness in predicting individual differences in reading skill in a shallow orthography (de Jong & van der Leij, 1999”