The Meaning, Antecedents and Outcomes of Employee Engagement: A Narrative Synthesis

By Catherine Bailey, A. Madden, Kerstin Alfes, Luke Fletcher. 2017

830 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3575df13756eb0da8f986033f25c58e0fccfeab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Inter-organizational collaboration and SMEs’ innovation: A systematic review and future research directions (2020, background): “Narrative synthesis gives reviewers the flexibility to thematically explore the relationship between and within studies with the aim to tell the story of findings from a diverse body of literature (Bailey et al., 2017; Nijmeijer et al., 2014).”
The effects of employee engagement and self-efficacy on job performance: a longitudinal field study (2018, background): “Although the majority of these studies were conducted at the individual level of analysis, the authors called for further longitudinal research that provides evidence for causal direction, such as by evaluating interventions aimed at enhancing employee engagement (Bailey et al., 2015).”
The Multilevel Nature of Customer Experience Research: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda (2018, neutral): “In line with Tranfield et al. (2003) and Bailey et al. (2015), we conducted a systematic literature review, adopting a well-respected evidence-based approach from medical science for our purposes: the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis (PRISMA) Protocol (Shamseer et…”
Work engagement interventions can be effective: a systematic review (2019, methodology): “Engagement as a construct comprising vigour, dedication and absorption, and the associated Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES; Schaufeli et al., 2002), is commonly understood to be the most researched and established conceptualisation (Bailey et al., 2015; Hakanan & Roodt, 2010).”
The relative importance of various job resources for work engagement: A concurrent and follow-up dominance analysis (2021, positive): “Research on work engagement—feeling vigorous, dedicated, and absorbed at work—has flourished during the past two decades and provided robust support for the benefits of work engagement both for employees and organizations (Bailey et al., 2015).”
Artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced technologies and human resource management: a systematic review (2021, background): “We sought to find common features between articles in order to categorize them into research themes based on the unit of analysis, which would enable us to address our research questions (Bailey et al., 2017).”