The Multilevel Nature of Customer Experience Research: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda
By A. Kranzbühler, Mirella Kleijnen, Robert E. Morgan, Marije L. Teerling. 2018
328 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Over the last three decades, customer experience (CE) has developed from a burgeoning concept to a widely recognized phenomenon in terms of both research and practice. To account for the complexity of consumption decisions, the CE literature encompasses both the rational information processing approach to consumer decision-making and the experiential approach, which includes emotions, feelings and sub-consciousness. The authors classify and examine CE research on two levels. Studies on static CE analyze experiences during touchpoints at one point in time, while studies on dynamic CE assess how experiences evolve over time. Furthermore, both static and dynamic CE research take place from two distinct theoretical perspectives: the organization and the consumer. As both theoretical perspectives essentially deal with the same phenomenon – the organizational perspective with the creation of CEs and the consumer perspective with the perception of customer experiences – there is potential for a productive symbiosis between them. The authors propose that connecting insights from both perspectives can contribute to a better understanding of what constitutes a CE for consumers and how firms can effectively manage it. First, the authors discuss the development of CE and argue that it has evolved into a broad and fragmented ‘umbrella construct’. Second, after distinguishing and defining static and dynamic CE, they systematically evaluate the state of knowledge in both the organizational and consumer perspectives. Finally, they develop an agenda for future research that integrates the consumer perspective into organizational CE research.
Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/19bb1c4b6020aa8800fcf2bbe384fdac39c4e4c2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Janet R. Mccoll-Kennedy
- Ruth N. Bolton
- Peeter W. J. Verlegh
- Lars Witell
- Mirella Kleijnen
- Chiara Orsingher
- Anna S. Mattila
- Adamantios Diamantopoulos
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Janet R. Mccoll-Kennedy
- Ruth N. Bolton
- Peeter W. J. Verlegh
- Lars Witell
- Mirella Kleijnen
- Chiara Orsingher
- Anna S. Mattila
- Bård Tronvoll
Citations in the corpus
- A systematic literature review on the impact of artificial intelligence on workplace outcomes: A multi-process perspective (2021, unknown): “…studies (Nielsen, Asmussen, & Weatherall, 2017), we also used a backward and forward snowballing procedure by searching the reference lists of the selected studies for additional works of relevance (e.g., Kranzbühler et al., 2018; Nielsen et al., 2017; Nofal, Nicolaou, Symeonidou, & Shane, 2018).”
- Beyond valence: a meta-analysis of discrete emotions in firm-customer encounters (2019, background): “that explicitly includes emotional responses of consumers (Kranzbühler et al. 2018).”
- Customer experience challenges: bringing together digital, physical and social realms (2018, background): “We view the customer experience as encompassing customers’ cognitive, emotional, social, sensory and value responses to the organization’s offerings over time, including pre- and post-consumption (Kranzbühler et al., 2017; Lemon and Verhoef, 2016; Voorhees et al., 2017).”