A Call for Examining Replication and Bias in Special Education Research

By Bryan G. Cook. 2014

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f2ad42ed8e082d75ad53af46ac33974ea227d1c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Christian T. Doabler
2. Bryan G. Cook
3. William J. Therrien
4. Mickey Losinski
5. Michael D. Coyne
6. Nicholas A. Gage
7. Brian Reichow
8. Jason C. Travers

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. William J. Therrien
2. Michael D. Coyne
3. Brian Reichow
4. Nicholas A. Gage
5. Jason C. Travers
6. Mickey Losinski
7. R. Ennis
8. Christian T. Doabler

In Safety Research

1. Bryan G. Cook
2. William J. Therrien
3. Michael D. Coyne
4. Mickey Losinski
5. Nicholas A. Gage
6. Brian Reichow
7. Jason C. Travers
8. R. Ennis

Citations in the corpus

• Replication Research and Special Education (2016, methodology): “, “p hacking”), regression to the mean phenomenon, and researcher bias (Cook, 2014; Makel & Plucker, 2014).”
• Testing the Immediate and Long-Term Efficacy of a Tier 2 Kindergarten Mathematics Intervention (2016, background): “There is a growing recognition of the importance in educational research to engage in and value replication studies, and future research planned will address this critical stage of research (Cook, 2014).”
• Recommendations for Replication Research in Special Education (2016, background): “Despite the generally acknowledged importance of replication to the validity of knowledge claims, the topic has received little attention in the special education literature (Cook, 2014).”
• Interventions to Improve Fraction Skills for Students With Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis (2019, background): “Bias in the literature can be a result of two main constructs, bias in the studies due to faulty methods (Cook, 2014) or publication bias, which is a result of journals having a tendency to publish only those studies with positive results (Maag & Losinski, 2015).”
• Publication Bias in Special Education Meta-Analyses (2017, methodology): “We therefore recommend that further research be conducted to examine and explore publication bias in special education (Cook, 2014). Specifically, future research could replicate (a) Shadish and colleagues’ (2016) survey of researchers’ publication preferences using a sample of special education res”