Job Satisfaction, Job Performance, and Effort: A Reexamination Using Agency Theory

448 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale (2014, background): “Conger and Kanungo (1988) noted this assertion, and pointed out that “delegating or resource sharing is only one set of conditions that may (but not necessarily) enable or empower subordinates” (p. 474), and advocated that empowerment alternatively should be viewed as a motivational approach. Likewi”
Leadership style, salesperson's work effort and job performance: the influence of power distance (2015, background): “Employee work effort is an input to the process that results in job performance as the output (Christen, Iyer, and Soberman 2006).”
The Impact of Management Practices on Employee Productivity: A Field Experiment with Airline Captains (2019, background): “48Evidence indicates that influencing job performance positively influences job satisfaction (or utility), whether through increased self-esteem or perceived managerial support for autonomous decision-making (Christen et al., 2006; Pugno and Depedri, 2009).”
Effort, Performance, and Conscientiousness: An Agency Theory Perspective (2007, background): “Christen, Iyer, and Soberman (2006) noted that effort and performance are related, but effort does not guarantee performance (i.e., they are distinct concepts).”