Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework
By Tobias Hahn, J. Pinkse, Lutz Preuss, Frank Figge. Journal of Business Ethics, 2014
986 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee8092c5cf131a77e0a1ddf84cd9b35d0b9cc152
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Asta Savaneviciene
- Ž. Stankevičiūtė
- Natalie Slawinski
- Michelle Adams
- Tony R. Walker
- Gregory M. Magnan
- Pratima Bansal
- Mehrnaz Ashrafi
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Yuzhuo Cai
- Michelle Adams
- Tony R. Walker
- Natalie Slawinski
- Gregory M. Magnan
- Pratima Bansal
- Asta Savaneviciene
- Mehrnaz Ashrafi
In Strategy and Management
- Yuzhuo Cai
- Asta Savaneviciene
- Ž. Stankevičiūtė
- Natalie Slawinski
- Henry Etzkowitz
- Michelle Adams
- Tony R. Walker
- Gregory M. Magnan
Citations in the corpus
- Short on Time: Intertemporal Tensions in Business Sustainability (2015, background): “A paradox lens, which seeks to understand how tensions are managed, is thus suited to handle the growing complexities of organizing, including managing the many tensions surrounding sustainability (Hahn et al. 2014).”
- Designing Sustainable HRM: The Core Characteristics of Emerging Field (2018, background): “From societal level sustainability, it was transposed to business level arguing that corporate sustainability requires organizations to address interconnected and interdependent economic, environmental, and social concerns at different levels [16,17].”
- Responsible Leadership: A Mapping of Extant Research and Future Directions (2015, background): “The literature on tensions and paradoxes (e.g., Smith and Lewis 2011; Smith and Tushman 2005), which has recently been considered in the context of sustainability (Hahn et al. 2014), may especially provide valuable insights here.”
- Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future (2020, background): “The conflicts between the goals of the three dimensions can lead to tensions with and between different innovation sectors (Hahn et al. 2015; Lattu and Cai 2020).”
- ‘How corporate social responsibility can be integrated into corporate sustainability: a theoretical review of their relationships’ (2018, background): “Indeed, integrating and balancing social, environmental, and economic dimensions simultaneously together with focusing on long-term nature of business activities are the key characteristics of sustainable development (Robinson 2004; Hahn et al. 2015).”