Individual Personality Factors That Affect Normative Beliefs About the Rightness of Corporate Social Responsibility

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Critical Essay: The reconciliation of fraternal twins: Integrating the psychological and sociological approaches to ‘micro’ corporate social responsibility (2019, background): “Consequently, empirical contributions show how motivations, cognitive, and affective evaluative processes shape individuals’ CSR engagement and reactions (e.g. Hafenbrädl and Waeger, 2017; Jones et al., 2014; Mudrack, 2007).”
Empowering Employee Sustainability: Perceived Organizational Support Toward the Environment (2015, unknown): “supervisor commitment to CSR (Ramus and Steger 2000), employee values (Mudrack 2007), and employee concern with issues (Bansal 2003) are reliable predictors of employee-level CSR engagement.”
What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility (2012, background): “…findings regarding supervisor commitment to CSR, some researchers have found that its antecedents include values (Mudrack, 2007), congruence of individual values with organizational values (Bansal, 2003), and individual concern with certain issues (Bansal, 2003; Bansal & Roth, 2000; Mudrack, 2007).”
The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review (2017, background): “Employee-focused studies suggest that egocentrism may prevent CSR engagement (Garavan, Heraty, Rock, & Dalton, 2010) and that Machiavellianism drives Friedmanian attitudes toward CSR (Mudrack, 2007).”