Identifying a core set of science teaching practices: A delphi expert panel approach

By Matthew Kloser. 2014

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea76a3ad4f991d857c7bed57b3587253ce80c975

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Christian D. Schunn
2. Miray Tekkumru‐Kisa
3. A. J. Visscher
4. Mary Kay Stein
5. Yong Wu
6. Kwangsu Cho
7. Young Hoan Cho

In Education

1. Christian D. Schunn
2. Miray Tekkumru‐Kisa
3. Courtney A. Bell
4. A. J. Visscher
5. Mary Kay Stein
6. Kirsti Klette
7. Yong Wu
8. Kwangsu Cho

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Christian D. Schunn
2. A. J. Visscher
3. Mary Kay Stein
4. Kirsti Klette

Citations in the corpus

• A Framework for Analyzing Cognitive Demand and Content-Practices Integration: Task Analysis Guide in Science (2015, background): “For example, recently Kloser (2014) presented a set of core science teaching practices that might best help teachers support current goals in science education, such as ‘‘constructing and interpreting models’’ and ‘‘engaging students in investigations.’’”
• Qualities of classroom observation systems (2018, background): “It is a subject-specific system; however, since its early stages, researchers have tested its applicability in other disciplines such as mathematics (Cohen, 2015) and science education (Kloser, 2014).”