Agriculture and the food industry in the information age

By Wim Verbeke. 2005

574 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9be07a5dd37e4f78dfef739d0a5f2ed5cb406a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Food Science

Citations in the corpus

Improving Eco-labelling as an Environmental Policy Instrument: Knowledge, Trust and Organic Consumption (2014, background): “The literature shows clearly that information overload and negative attitudes might prevent consumers from acquiring and processing new information (for a review see Verbeke, 2005, for newer references see e.g. Bawden & Robinson, 2009; Smed & Andersen, 2012).”
Health-related attitudes as a basis for segmenting European fish consumers (2010, background): “However, scientific evidence shows that also tailored health communications have achieved only modest success in changing a number of health-related behaviours (Verbeke, 2005).”
Consumer interest in information cues denoting quality, traceability and origin: An application of ordered probit models to beef labels (2006, background): “Labelling debates are largely about information and the processing and use of the information by consumers (Teisl & Roe, 1998; Verbeke, 2005).”
Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society (2015, background): “Readiness to adopt insects was analyzed as a discrete (yes/no) decision (see also Verbeke, 2005a) by specifying the response categories ‘‘totally agree’’ and ‘‘agree’’ as a ‘‘yes’’ (19.3%), and the other response categories as a ‘‘no’’ (80.7%).”
Consumer trust in the food value chain and its impact on consumer confidence: A model for assessing consumer trust and evidence from a 5-country study in Europe (2020, background): “…the changing communication landscape and the advent of social media (ALLEA, 2019), food information (e.g., labelling) as a means to convey relevant information (Verbeke, 2011, 2005), and through control mechanisms such as quality signs, third party auditing or guarantees (Krieger & Schiefer, 2007).”
Consumer-driven definition of traditional food products and innovation in traditional foods. A qualitative cross-cultural study. (2009, unknown): “information about the traditional character of a food product in this specific case), may act as a convenient guide for consumers to make fast decisions in line with their preferences (Verbeke, 2005).”
The impacts of the food traceability system and consumer involvement on consumers' purchase intentions toward fast foods (2013, background): “The relationship between consumer trust and food product safety have aroused broad attention worldwide (Grunert, 2005; Rohr, Luddecke, Drusch, Muller, & Alvensleben, 2005; Verbeke, 2005).”
Sustainable Food Consumption: Exploring the Consumer “Attitude – Behavioral Intention” Gap (2006, background): “In the wake of the series of crises within the European agro-food system, culminating in BSE, dioxin, and foot and mouth disease, the general public in Europe became increasingly critical about food quality and safety (Jensen and Sandoe, 2002; Grunert, 2005; Verbeke, 2005 ).”
Determinants of halal meat consumption in France (2007, background): “Control factors such as perceived availability may facilitate or inhibit the performance of behaviour (Conner and Armitage, 1998; Verbeke and Lopez, 2005; Tarkiainen and Sundqvist, 2005; Verbeke, 2005).”
Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand (2005, background): “This problem is especially severe for functional foods, where the credence characteristic is the major selling point (Bech-Larsen and Grunert, 2003; Frewer et al., 2003; Verbeke, 2005).”