Predicting effectiveness in global leadership activities

By Paula M. Caligiuri, I. Tarique. 2009

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e86c3c49dcc7365e05391e059ce2ce9cb9cdcc3f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Learning Agility: In Search of Conceptual Clarity and Theoretical Grounding (2012, background): “For example, in the context of cross-cultural management, Caligiuri and Tarique (2009) note the importance of developing what they call ‘‘cultural agility,’’ which similarly captures the ability to move quickly (in their case from one culture to another).”
Selection for international assignments (2009, background): “In a recent study Caligiuri and Tarique (2009) found evidence suggesting that family diversity (defined as an individual's country of birth with respect to the national backgrounds of his/her parent) predicted global leadership effectiveness.”
Dynamic cross-cultural competencies and global leadership effectiveness (2012, background): “Dynamic cross-cultural competencies are positively related to global leadership effectiveness such that ethnocentrism (H1a) is negatively related while cultural flexibility (H1b) and tolerance of ambiguity (H1c) are positively related.”
Integrating global mobility and global talent management: Exploring the challenges and strategic opportunities (2014, background): “Leader’s personality characteristics combined with high-contact, cross-cultural leadershipdevelopment experiences emerge as key in determining global leaders’ effectiveness (Caligiuri & Tarique, 2009).”
Enhancing Cultural Intelligence: The Roles of Implicit Culture Beliefs and Adjustment (2017, background): “…perspectives (Tadmor, Hong, Chao, Wiruchnipawan, & Wang, 2012), facilitating cultural knowledge acquisition and cultural understanding (Amir, 1969; Caligiuri & Tarique, 2009); however, intercultural contact might backfire, resulting in cultural avoidance (Kenworthy et al., 2008) and other…”
Measuring cultural intelligence (CQ) (2015, unknown): “For example, international assignments relate positively to the development of CQ (Caligiuri and Tarique, 2009).”