Ownership and Control Rights in Internet Portal Alliances, 1995-1999

By Daniel W. Elfenbein, Josh Lerner. 2003

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6c825a1366443a8611ab7c37ac012ee72482b21

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Strategic Alliances and the Boundaries of the Firm (2008, unknown): “It is easy to see that the only optimal guarantee is to promise a single unit—two units is not positive NPV in expectation, and a guarantee of zero provides no added incentives.”
The Intra-Alliance Division of Value Created through Collaboration (2011, background): “This stream of work suggests that the analysis of contractual provisions can provide a bridge between research on alliance design and research on the performance of alliance partners, since contracts also specify the distribution of gains between alliance partners (Elfenbein and Lerner, 2003).”
Strategic Alliances: Bridges between "Islands of Conscious Power" (2008, background): “Regarding property rights, Garvey (1995), Baker, Gibbons, and Murphy (1999, 2002), and Halonen (2002) enriched static models in the Grossman-Hart-Moore tradition by adding ongoing relationships to static property-rights models.”
Strategy in High-Velocity Environments (2007, background): “Co-operation can be beneficial for portals in two ways.(31) First, the portals receive direct compensation in exchange for advertisements, promotions and other services.”
Transaction Cost Economics: An Assessment of Empirical Research in the Social Sciences (2006, background): “Some of the other papers that explore the influence of transaction and institutional-level factors on alliance formation include Artz and Brush (2000), Elfenbein and Lerner (2003), Gulati and Singh (1998), Pisano (1990a), Robertson and Gatignon (1998) and Simonin (1999).”
Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners (2014, background): “Nevertheless, ome scholars (e.g. Carson and John, 2013; Hagedoorn and Hesen, 007; Elfenbein and Lerner, 2003, 2012) have previously demontrated that it is possible to construct relatively large datasets on ontractual agreements concerning R&D collaborations.”
Four formal(izable) theories of the firm (2005, background): “In particular, many recent empirical papers can be seen as analyzing issues akin to contractual movements of decision rights across fixed firm boundaries—including Arru˜ nada et al. (2001), Bidwell (2004), Elfenbein and Lerner (2003) , Kaplan and Str¨ omberg (2003), Lafontaine and Masten (2002), Le”
1 Moving Beyond Schumpeter: Management Research on the Determinants of Technological Innovation (2008, unknown): “…in high technology sectors of the economy (Hagedoorn & Schakenraad, 1990; Mowery, 1989; Osborn & Baughn, 1987; Whittaker & Bower, 1994) such as information technology (Elfenbein & Lerner, 2003; Sampson, 2005), materials and biotechnology (Baum, Calabrese, & Silverman, 2000; Stuart, 2000).”