The Value-Relevance of Network Advantages: The Case of E-Commerce Firms
By Shivaram Rajgopal, Mohan Venkatachalam, Suresh Babu Kotha. 2003
172 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e39096094ee277d14cc140d2104312d170a4ef9b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Manuel Castelo Branco
- I. Lourenço
- José Dias Curto
- J. Berbegal‐Mirabent
- Silvana Trimi
- Henrik Nilsson
- Richard J. Arend
- Jeffrey L. Callen
In Strategy and Management
- I. Lourenço
- José Dias Curto
- Manuel Castelo Branco
- J. Berbegal‐Mirabent
- Silvana Trimi
- Henrik Nilsson
- Richard J. Arend
- Jeffrey L. Callen
Citations in the corpus
- Was There Too Little Entry During the Dot Com Era (2007, unknown): “For example, there is ample evidence that GBF criteria such as web tra c measures predicted stock market valuation of internet rms over and above traditional evaluation criteria during the period (Hand 2001; Rajgopal, Venkatachalam, and Kotha 2003; Trueman, Wong, and Zhang 2000).”
- Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms (2007, unknown): “Although we build on earlier studies that examine how business models are linked to firm performance (e.g, Rajgopal et al. 2003 ), we believe that this is the first study to operationalize, measure, and test the performance consequences of business model design themes.”
- What financial and non‐financial information on intangibles is value‐relevant? A review of the evidence (2008, unknown): “Rajgopal et al. (2003) find competitive advantage output metrics relating to network advantages from website traffic are incrementally value-relevant over earnings and the book value of shareholders’ equity.”
- How Does the Market Value Corporate Sustainability Performance? (2011, unknown): “…studies have already found a significant relation between the market value of equity and non-financial information, like network advantages (Rajgopal et al. 2003), environmental performance (Hassel et al. 2005), eco-efficiency (Sinkin et al. 2008), or technological conditions (Matolcsy and…”
- The business model: Present and future—beyond a skeumorph (2013, methodology): “The business model has been considered context dependent (e.g. Dahan et al., 2010; Zott and Amit, 2007), firm dependent (e.g. Rajgopal et al., 2003), and time dependent (i.e. static; George and Bock, 2011).”
- The Value Relevance of Reputation for Sustainability Leadership (2014, background): “erature on the value relevance of non-financial information that find a significant relation between the market value of equity and non-financial information unrelated to CS in the North American context (Matolcsy and Wyatt 2008; Rajgopal et al. 2003).”
- Business model innovation in entrepreneurship (2012, background): “…the sources of new value creation and potential competitive advantage (Afuah 2004; Chesbrough 2010; Chesbrough and Rosenbloom 2002; Mahadevan 2000; Voelpel et al. 2005), deliver and capture the mechanisms employed (Teece 2010), and act as drivers of firm performance (Rajgopal et al. 2003).”
- The value relevance of environmental performance (2005, background): “Such extensions of purely financial models include the Amir and Lev (1996) study of the wireless communications industry, the Deng et al. (1999) study of high-tech firms, and the studies by Trueman et al. (2000) and Rajgopal et al. (2003) of the valuation of internet stocks.”