The strategic value of CEO external directorate networks: implications for CEO compensation

By Marta A. Geletkanycz, B. Boyd, Sydney Finkelstein. 2001

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e26dd3a54337c01df624d02eaeeaa5253c0b7267

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Constance E. Helfat
2. Igor Filatotchev
3. B. Gerhart
4. Yung-chih Lien
5. I. Fulmer
6. Ron Adner
7. Wei Shen
8. Philip M. Podsakoff

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Nathan P. Podsakoff
2. Wei Shen
3. B. Gerhart
4. Philip M. Podsakoff
5. I. Fulmer
6. Yung-chih Lien
7. Constance E. Helfat
8. Igor Filatotchev

In Strategy and Management

1. Igor Filatotchev
2. Constance E. Helfat
3. Nathan P. Podsakoff
4. Philip M. Podsakoff
5. Ron Adner
6. B. Gerhart
7. Yung-chih Lien
8. Wei Shen

Citations in the corpus

• 6 Pay and Performance: Individuals, Groups, and Executives (2009, background): “Social status, legitimacy, and resource‐dependence arguments have also been used to explain why CEO networks of external board memberships are related to pay when firms are highly diversified (Geletkanycz, Boyd, & Finkelstein, 2001 ).”
• Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities (2003, background): “We propose that dynamic managerial capabilities are rooted in three underlying factors: managerial human capital (Castanias and Helfat, 1991, 2001), managerial social capital (Burt, 1992; Gelatkanycz, Boyd, and Finkelstein, 2001 ), and managerial cognition (Hambrick and Mason, 1984; Huff, 1990; Hoo”
• Human Capital and CEO Compensation during Institutional Transitions (2015, unknown): “Because CEOs are aware that their human capital adds value, they are interested in leveraging it to maximize compensation (Geletkanycz et al., 2001; Pandher and Currie, 2013).”
• Executive Compensation: A Multidisciplinary Review of Recent Developments (2007, unknown): “Finally, in a cross-sectional study, Geletkanycz, Boyd, and Finkelstein (2001) investigated whether outside director service on other boards impacted CEO compensation.”
• Corporate Governance and Performance in Publicly Listed, Family-Controlled Firms: Evidence from Taiwan (2005, background): “Geletkanycz, Boyd, and Finkelstein (2001) associate board ownership with strategic power, whereas Hambrick and Jackson (2000) indicate that share ownership not only creates financial incentives for independent directors 268 FILATOTCHEV, LIEN AND PIESSE”
• The Role of Formative Measurement Models in Strategic Management Research: Review, Critique, and Implications for Future Research (2006, background): “Finally, many of the constructs in the areas of strategic leadership and corporate governance would also appear to be more appropriately modeled as having formative indicators, including CEO compensation (Geletkanycz, Boyd, & Finkelstein, 2001), external ties (Geletkanycz et al., 2001), managerial d”