Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods

By S. Youn. 2015

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a89d43e39d18aaef55dc08d8c11ac208282e996

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Carsten Roever
2. G. Kasper
3. Naoko Taguchi
4. Numa Markee
5. J. C. Félix-Brasdefer
6. Sharyl Tanck
7. John Hellermann
8. Anne-Marie Barraja-Rohan

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Carsten Roever
2. G. Kasper
3. S. Youn

Citations in the corpus

• Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct in testing speaking (2018, background): “This analysis indicates that speaking tests can be set up to make aspects of test takers’ IC visible and scorable, for example, by eliciting request sequences and assessing the test taker’s use of pre-sequences and action formats (Youn, 2015).”