Value-based Business Strategy
By Adam Brandenburger, Harborne W. Stuart Jr.. 2005
1,084 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0af559aa1ffc8e01dcd0b146166eb4a8031b3fe
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Raphael Amit
- Michael J. Leiblein
- Olivier Chatain
- Christoph Zott
- Peter Zemsky
- Giovanni Gavetti
- Joost Rietveld
- Goran Roos
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Giovanni Gavetti
- Michael J. Leiblein
- Daniel A. Levinthal
- Olivier Chatain
- Jan W. Rivkin
- S. G. Winter
- N. J. Foss
- Christoph Zott
Citations in the corpus
- Business-Model Innovation: General Purpose Technologies and their Implications for Industry Structure (2010, background): “A business model is an organization’s approach to generating revenue at a reasonable cost, and incorporates assumptions about how it will both create and capture value.(1) Teece identifies a business model as reflecting ‘management’s hypothesis about what customers want, how they want it, and how an”
- Game Theory in Supply Chain Analysis (2004, background): “Hence, cooperative GT allows us to model outcomes of complex business processes that otherwise might be too difficult to describe, e.g., negotiations, and answers more general questions, e.g., how well is the firm positioned against competition (see [ 14 ]).”
- Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms (2007, positive): “It is the upper limit for the value that can be captured by the focal firm (Brandenburger and Stuart 1996). An important question emerges: How does business model design influence the competing claims to total value created by different stakeholders to the business model? Drawing on Porter (1980) an”
- Toward a Behavioral Theory of Strategy (2012, background): “On the one hand, these failures play an important role to the existence of superior opportunities; on the other hand, a superior ability to counter them results in superior performance.”
- The logic of appropriability: From Schumpeter to Arrow to Teece (2006, methodology): “What is clear, however, is that the tool kit of non-zero-sum game theory has ready application here (Brandenburger and Stuart, 1996; Lippman and Rumelt, 2003).”
- Insights and New Directions from Demand-Side Approaches to Technology Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Strategic Management Research (2012, background): “Hence, demand-side studies typically examine value-searching or benefitcombining mechanisms that provide utility for customers, reflected by their willingness to pay (e.g., Adner et al., 2010; Brandenburger & Stuart, 1996), instead of mechanisms to capture value for the firm as suggested by the RBV.”
- The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance (2008, methodology): “edu contribution was made by Chandler (1962), who considered the contingency relationship between a firm’s corporate strategy and its internal administrative structure (specifically, divisional versus functional form).”
- Biform Games (2007, methodology): “Before this preview, let us also mention the connection to work in a related field, namely the models formulated by Grossman and Hart (1986) and Hart 2Brandenburger and Stuart (1996) contains a similar discussion of cooperative game theory.”