The logic of appropriability: From Schumpeter to Arrow to Teece

By S. G. Winter. 2006

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fff665f9cca6c9182aec8670b4c9d9bbed7f2794

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Giovanni Dosi
2. Richard R. Nelson
3. Fulvio Castellacci
4. David J. Teece
5. Jason L. Dedrick
6. Heli Wang
7. Kenneth L. Kraemer
8. W. Furtan

In Management Information Systems

1. Andy Neely
2. Richard R. Nelson
3. Jason L. Dedrick
4. Kenneth L. Kraemer
5. Fulvio Castellacci
6. Frank Wiengarten
7. David J. Teece
8. Giovanni Dosi

Citations in the corpus

• Technological regimes and sectoral differences in productivity growth (2007, background): “5 For a discussion of the concept of appropriability in the classical contributions of Schumpeter, Arrow and Teece, see Winter (2006b).”
• Who Profits from Innovation in Global Value Chains? A Study of the iPod and Notebook PCs (2010, background): “It explicitly deals with firm strategy and organization as a means to appropriate value from innovation (Winter, 2006).”
• Only the Brave: Product Innovation, Service Business Model Innovation, and Their Impact on Performance (2016, background): “Furthermore, while the business model provides a fairly holistic perspective of the entire activity system that needs to accompany product innovation, the notion that product innovation alone is insufficient is not new (Teece 1986; Winter 2006).”
• Innovation and integration in the agri-food industry (2009, background): “9, University of Copenhagen, regime of the industry and the prevailing form of integration, with more hierarchical structures expected in industries withweak appropriability regimes andmore vertical structures expected in industries with strong appropriability regimes (Teece, 1986; Winter, 2006).”
• Appropriability, Preemption, and Firm Performance (2009, unknown): “This standard definition of appropriability is influenced by the work of Kenneth Arrow and Joseph Schumpeter, among others (see Winter, 2006 for a recent overview of the appropriability literature).”
• Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation (2010, background): “The framework employs contracting theory, 22 and recognizes two extreme modes (models) by which innovators can capture value from innovation: At one end of the scale stands the integrated business model, in which an innovating firm bundles innovation and product together, and assumes the…”
• The value of intellectual property rights to firms and society (2007, background): “Twenty years after this article appeared the current edition of Research Policy is entirely devoted to articles considering the impact of this shift of focus, (see Nelson, 2006; Pisano, 2006; Teece, 2006; Winter, 2006).”
• Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants' technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry (2015, unknown): “Winter SG. 2006.”
• Is firm-specific innovation associated with greater value appropriation? The roles of environmental dynamism and technological diversity (2010, background): “The innovation literature has long been concerned with how well an innovative firm is able to appropriate the economic value generated from their innovations (Cockburn and Griliches, 1988; Griliches, 1990; Teece, 1986; Harabi, 1995; Winter, 2006).”
• Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics as Evolutionary Processes (2009, background): “(For a fine discussion see Winter, 2006a.”