Theoretical Comparisons of Forms of Exchange*

By Linda D. Molm. 2003

415 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e04918e95468ad36407f735b198c38601cd519c0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Human Resource Systems and Helping in Organizations: A Relational Perspective (2011, background): “However, the preeminence of reciprocity diminishes the self-interested bargaining associated with market pricing climates, and instead emphasizes that the actions of one person are tied with another's actions over time (Molm, 2003).”
In good company: The impact of perceived organizational support and positive relationships at work on turnover intentions (2015, background): “These bidirectional transactions can be self-reinforcing, such that the exchange cycle continues without explicit negotiation or formalization (Molm, 2003).”
Chutes Versus Ladders: Anchoring Events and a Punctuated-Equilibrium Perspective on Social Exchange Relationships (2010, background): “Positive balances lead to a gradual emergence of more generalized relationships where a less immediate or precise accounting for these balances emerges (Lawler, 2001; Molm, 2003).”
Taking a Multifoci Approach to the Study of Justice, Social Exchange, and Citizenship Behavior: The Target Similarity Model† (2007, background): “First, social exchange research has argued that outcomes can affect relationships (e.g., Molm, 2003).”
Once upon a time (2016, background): “This is especially the case when individuals give and reciprocate benefits without negotiation—as in the embedded reciprocal exchanges we discuss here (Molm, 2003).”
How Doctors Gain Social and Economic Returns in Online Health-Care Communities: A Professional Capital Perspective (2017, background): “Furthermore, a social exchange includes a bidirectional transaction, which translates into “something has to be given and something returned” [15, 48].”
Untangling the Networking Phenomenon (2015, background): “We clarify that the type of exchange transaction, economic or social, may dictate the type of exchange relationship that forms over time and vice versa (e.g., Cropanzano & Mitchell, 2005; Graen & Scandura, 1987; Molm, 2003).”