The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups

By D. Zohar. 2002

863 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Social Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dfed816588a1b82092f76602231a7a7dd7894eaf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

In Social Psychology

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

The relationship between psychological capital, job satisfaction, and safety perceptions in the maritime industry (2015, background): “Because workers within a ship by nature will interact more often with each other than with workers on other ships, their individual perceptions of safety climate will over time shape safety focused behavior onboard (Schneider and Reichers, 1983; Zohar, 2000, 2002, 2010).”
The role of prosocial and proactive safety behaviors in predicting safety performance (2015, background): “Behavioral safety interventions, for example, have been shown to reduce micro-accidents more effectively than lost-time injuries (Cavalleri & Gobba, 1989; Zohar, 2002b).”
Inconsistent style of leadership as a predictor of safety behaviour (2011, positive): “…associated with decreased business unit performance (Howell & Avolio, 1993) employee well-being (Skogstad, Einarsen, Torsheim, Aasland, & Hetland, 2007), follower satisfaction with their leader (Judge & Piccolo, 2004) as well as with negative safety outcomes (Kelloway et al., 2006; Zohar, 2002a).”
Positive psychology in practice (2004, neutral): “, 2002) and quasi-experimental investigations (Sivanathan et al., 2003; Zohar, 2002).”
Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. (2011, background): “…in the context of safety, employees may receive leadership support by way of leaders communicating the value of safety to their employees, helping employees develop new ways to achieve safety, and having a concern about employee safety (Zacharatos, Barling & Iverson, 2005; Zohar, 2002a, 2002b).”
How leaders differentially motivate safety compliance and safety participation: The role of monitoring, inspiring, and learning (2013, result): “Although previous studies established the importance of leadership in employee’s safety performance (e.g. Barling et al., 2002; Hofmann and Morgeson, 1999; Kelloway et al., 2006; Zohar, 2002), these research efforts tended to focus on the effect of transformational leadership on safety participation”
Promoting Subjective Well-Being at Work (2008, background): “Transformational leadership has been shown to be related to one aspect of well-being, that of workplace safety (Zohar, 2002).”
Safety Climate in Organizations (2016, neutral): “Moreover, safety performance behaviors tend to be predicted with greater accuracy than more distal outcomes, which often have a low base rate and skewed distributions (cf. Zohar, 2000; 2002).”
Teamwork and associated psychological factors: A review (2006, background): “Zohar (2002) Public serviceadmin Production teams Longitudinal/not reported Not reported/ Israel Transformational and transactional leadership provide complementary modes of (mediated and moderated) influence on safety behaviour of team-members Behaviour 1 1 4 T .”