When the abuse is unevenly distributed: The effects of abusive supervision variability on work attitudes and behaviors

By B. Ogunfowora. 2013

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dfa9b909db3aa99bed0ce17d001acd82d0a0d256

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. J. Mackey
2. Mark J. Martinko
3. Rachel E. Frieder
4. Zhen Wang
5. Lu Xing
6. S. Hannah
7. Jeremy Brees
8. H. Xu

In Social Psychology

1. J. Mackey
2. Zhen Wang
3. Lu Xing
4. Mark J. Martinko
5. S. Hannah
6. Jeremy Brees
7. H. Xu
8. Rachel E. Frieder

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Mackey
2. Mark J. Martinko
3. Rachel E. Frieder
4. Zhen Wang
5. Lu Xing
6. S. Hannah
7. Jeremy Brees
8. H. Xu

Citations in the corpus

• Abusive Supervision: A Meta-Analysis and Empirical Review (2017, methodology): “For example, Ogunfowora (2013) used the theory of deontic justice to suggest that individuals who are not directly affected by supervisory abuse may still develop strong negative reactions toward the perpetrating supervisor.”
• Not All Followers Socially Learn from Ethical Leaders: The Roles of Followers’ Moral Identity and Leader Identification in the Ethical Leadership Process (2019, background): “We assessed the extent to which participants view their leaders as an ethical role model with three items developed by Ogunfowora (2013).”