Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class

By Paul Rollinson. 2005

643 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dda304e18d241a154ef8f5e06641aa17f43b2090

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Language and Linguistics

In Literature and Literary Theory

Citations in the corpus

The Effect of Peer Reviewing on Writing Apprehension and Essay Writing Ability of Prospective EFL Teachers (2012, background): “This finding echoes findings of other ESL research studies (Shaw, 2002; Rollinson, 2005; Wu, 2006; Fallahi, et al., 2006; Zheng, 2007; Gielen et al., 2010; etc.).”
The Creative Process (2005, positive): “Rollinson (2005) shows that peers can provide useful feedback, of a different nature (e.g., more informal) than the ones that a teacher can provide and that peer-feedback enforces collaboration between students and helps them to become more critical.”
The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence (2012, background): “…to orienting L2 learners to the content of peer feedback and the structure of peer feedback sessions (Liu and Hansen, 2002; Mendonca and Johnson, 1994; Rollinson, 2005), fairly little attention has been focused on the language used to provide negative assessment (see Nguyen and Basturkmen, 2010).”
Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (2011, background): “Although research examining these variables in association with motor skill learning is progressing, at the present time it is not yet possible to draw conclusions about the association between these variables and motor skill development.”
A Peer Review Training Workshop: Coaching Students to Give and Evaluate Peer Feedback (2010, background): “As revealed by Rollinson (2005), teacher intervention is also one of the contributing factors that make the implementation of peer review activities profitable in the classroom.”
The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2018, background): “Reviewing peers’work is also likely to help students become better reviewers of their own work and to revise and improve their own work (Rollinson 2005).”
Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom (2010, background): “It is also noteworthy that although the essential role of training in peer feedback has been widely discussed in the relevant empirical studies (Berg, 1999; Hansen & Liu, 2005; Hu, 2005; Min, 2005; Rollinson, 2005; Stanley, 1992; Zhu, 1995), the teacher maintained that learning was a self-discovery ”
Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014) (2016, background): “Based on a summary of the major arguments in favour of and against peer feedback in the ESL writing class, Rollinson (2005) discussed how L2 writing teachers can develop appropriate implementation procedures and create a positive environment for effective peer feedback activities.”