Nonresponse and generalizability in academic research

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Shared Authentic Leadership and New Venture Performance (2012, methodology): “This latter point is particularly salient when a rigorous sampling procedure is employed (Blair & Zinkman, 2006), as was the case in the present study.”
Hotel Employee Work Engagement and Its Consequences (2016, methodology): “Such a data collection practice might have caused selection bias or nonresponse bias if the managers and executives did not distribute the questionnaires according to the author’s instructions (Blair & Zinkhan, 2006).”
PLS: A Silver Bullet? (2006, background): “As knowledge accumulates, findings that are flukes of a sample or otherwise not robust will tend to fall by the wayside (Blair and Zinkhan 2006).”
Market Orientation and Internationalization in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises (2008, unknown): “…results of this test, it should be noted that any nonresponse bias that might be present is more likely to affect individual measures, rather than causal relationships among variables studied here—which are more likely to be affected by a lack of diversity in a sample (Blair and Zinkhan 2006).”
The effect of psychological capital on conflicts in the work–family interface, turnover and absence intentions (2014, background): “Though the researcher had iven information to managers to distribute the questionnaires to wide array of employees in frontline service jobs, this practice ight have created a selection bias (Blair and Zinkhan, 2006).”