RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EPISTEMOLOGICAL BELIEFS AND CONCEPTUAL CHANGE LEARNING
By Gaoyin Qian, Donna E. Alvermann. 2000
158 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db5618c4a27d8de928ff172a029df6ffe733c154
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Gale M. Sinatra
- Rainer Bromme
- B. Hofer
- Ivar Bråten
- Dorothe Kienhues
- Elmar Stahl
- E. Michael Nussbaum
- Jeffrey Alan Greene
In Education
- Gale M. Sinatra
- Rainer Bromme
- B. Hofer
- Dorothe Kienhues
- Ivar Bråten
- Elmar Stahl
- E. Michael Nussbaum
- Jeffrey Alan Greene
Citations in the corpus
- Knowledge and Epistemological Beliefs: An Intimate but Complicate Relationship (2008, background): “To add some more examples: college students’ epistemological beliefs influence conceptual change ( Qian & Alvermann, 2000; Sinatra & Pintrich, 2003), cognitive processes during 20 Knowledge and Epistemological Beliefs 427”
- Personal Epistemology Research: Implications for Learning and Teaching (2001, background): “For example, beliefs about the nature of knowledge may influence strategy use (Schommer et al., 1992), cognitive processing (Kardash and Howell, 2000), and conceptual change learning (Qian and Alvermann, 2000).”
- Student Thought and Classroom Language: Examining the Mechanisms of Change in Dialogic Teaching (2013, unknown): “…subject, to identify informal reasoning fallacies, and to construct arguments of higher quality (e.g., Kuhn, 1991; Mason & Scirica, 2006; Nussbaum, Sinatra, & Poliquin, 2008; Qian & Alvermann, 2000; Songer & Linn, 1991; Stromso & Braten, 2009; Weinstock, 2006; Weinstock, Neuman, & Tabak, 2004).”
- Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and Psychology (2011, unknown): “…model of epistemological beliefs, many researchers have explicitly drawn on this framework (e.g., Greene et al., 2008; Mason & Scirica, 2006; Muis, Bendixen, & Haerle, 2006; Muis & Franco, 2009; Qian & Alvermann, 2009; Stathopoulou & Vosniadou, 2007; Tsai, 2008; Weinstock & Cronin, 2003).”
- Introduction: Paradigmatic Approaches to Personal Epistemology (2004, background): “Beliefs about the nature of knowledge may influence comprehension (Schommer, 1990), cognitive processing (Kardash & Howell, 2000), and conceptual change learning (Qian & Alvermann, 2000), for example.”
- Epistemological beliefs across cultures: critique and analysis of beliefs structure studies (2004, unknown): “…reading, conceptual changes, study strategies, perseverance and motivation (Hofer, 2000; Jehng, Johnson, & Anderson, 1993; Kardash & Scholes, 1996; Qian & Alvermann, 1995, 2000; Schommer, 1990; Schommer, Crouse, & *Corresponding author: Department of Educational Psychology, Counselling and…”
- Personal epistemology and relational pedagogy in early childhood teacher education programs (2006, background): “beliefs which Qian and Alvermann (2000) also acknowledged may be necessary to”
- Epistemological Understanding as a Metacognitive Process: Thinking Aloud During Online Searching (2004, background): “For example, epistemological and epistemic beliefs have been examined in relation to strategy use (Schommer, Crouse, & Rhodes, 1992), cognitive processing (Kardash & Howell, 2000), conceptual change learning (Qian, 2000), and moral reasoning (Bendixen et al.”
- Personal Epistemology and Culture (2008, background): “Studies conducted primarily in the USA, for example, suggest that beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing influence strategy use (Schommer et al., 1992), cognitive processing (Kardash & Howell, 2000), motivation (Buehl & Alexander, 2005), and conceptual change learning ( Qian, 2000 ), amon”
- Role of Epistemic Beliefs and Scientific Argumentation in Science Learning (2008, methodology): “Central processing, focusing on the evaluation of arguments, has been found to be related to more significant conceptual change (Dole & Sinatra, 1998; Petty & Wegener, 1999). The second part of our hypothesis was that students who developed better arguments would experience more of a conceptual shif”