Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness

By Carmelo J. Turillo, Robert Folger, James J. Lavelle, Elizabeth E. Umphress, Julie O. Gee. 2002

417 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8fa09bebd0b868c4da9715c6562be133710f42d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Different wrongs, different remedies? Reactions to organizational remedies after procedural and interactional injustice. (2006, background): “In other words, aggrieved workers are often motivated to see the perpetrator suffer, which can lead to revengeful behaviors, even at the expense of one’s own instrumental benefit (Bies & Tripp, 1996; Bies et al., 1997; Goldman, 2003; Turillo et al., 2002).”
Organizational justice: New insights from behavioural ethics (2013, positive): “…of deontic or moral motives for organizational justice is growing (for a review, see Cropanzano et al., 2003), with these studies often showing that individuals seek fairness at work even when they are personally disadvantaged by just decisions (e.g. Greenberg, 2002; Turillo et al., 2002).”
On preferences and doing the right thing: Satisfaction with advantageous inequity when cognitive processing is limited (2006, background): “If future research Wndings would indeed support Rivera and Tedeschi’s (1976) account of the diVerence between public and private reactions to advantageous inequity (but see Ellard et al., 2004; Turillo et al., 2002), we would suggest that this account is congruent with the line of reasoning we have ”
Organizational Justice and Behavioral Ethics: Promises and Prospects (2009, background): “With this in mind, contemporary organizational justice research typically recognizes at least three, and possibility four, human motives that are relevant to justice perceptions (cf. Blader & Tyler, 2005; Cropanzano, Rupp, et al., 2001; Cropanzano & Rupp, 2002; 2003; Skitka, 2003; Skitka & Bravo, 20”