On preferences and doing the right thing: Satisfaction with advantageous inequity when cognitive processing is limited
By K. van den Bos, S. Peters, D. Bobocel, J. Ybema. 2006
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b44a13bd0a5e58a758208103e97586b140521ee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The Effect of Cognitive Load on Economic Decision Making (2015, background): “On the other hand, Van den Bos et al. (2006) and Schulz et al. (2014) find the opposite effect: generosity increases when subjects are under cognitive load.”
- Consumer Reaction to Unearned Preferential Treatment (2013, background): “Research has shown that receiving advantageous inequity (e.g., a lower price, a higher salary) makes individuals happy and satisfied but may not be perceived to be the right thing for a company to do (van den Bos et al. 2006; Xia and Monroe 2010).”
- Cognitive Load in the Multi-Player Prisoner's Dilemma Game: Are There Brains in Games? (2014, unknown): “…(Gilbert et al., 1988; Swann et al., 1990), perform worse on gambling tasks (Hinson et al. 2002), are more susceptible to a social label (Cornelissen et al., 2007), and have di¤erent evaluations of the fairness of outcomes (Cornelissen et al., 2011; van den Bos et al., 2006; Hauge et al., 2009).”