Stress and well-being in the workplace: Support for key propositions from the social identity approach.

By Rolf van Dick, S. A. Haslam. 2012

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d70a8d109f27c164395059fc2f2b8740c0967ecc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Epidemiology

Citations in the corpus

Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model (2014, background): “On the other hand, people also receive more support and feel more supported to the extent that any support is perceived to originate from an ingroup rather than an outgroup source (Platow et al., 2007; van Dick & Haslam, 2012).”
Individual‐ and group‐level effects of social identification on workplace bullying (2013, methodology): “Based on a Social Identity Approach to work stress (Haslam & van Dick, 2011; van Dick & Haslam, 2012), we assumed that shared social identities would reduce the likelihood of the occurrence of bullying in workgroups.”
Why does organizational identification relate to reduced employee burnout? The mediating influence of social support and collective efficacy (2015, methodology): “Specifically, van Dick and Haslam (2012) proposed that “just as social support can mediate the direct relationship between identification and well-being (and stress), so too the development of a collective response to stress can mediate the relationship between support and well-being” (p. 17).”
Does job insecurity threaten who you are? Introducing a social identity perspective to explain well-being and performance consequences of job insecurity (2017, background): “Effects on well-being have only recently been of interest in social identity research (e.g., Haslam & Van Dick, 2011; Van Dick & Haslam, 2012), which has traditionally concerned itself with attitudinal and behavioural outcomes.”
The downside of organizational identification: Relations between identification, workaholism and well-being (2012, background): “We believe though, that stress also has important social dimensions; indeed ‘‘people working in the same work environment often come to share complaints related to their work experience’’ (van Dick & Haslam, 2012, p. 177).”