Gender differences in scholastic achievement: a meta-analysis.
By D. Voyer, Susan D. Voyer. Psychological bulletin, 2014
1,321 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d560c3c8cfe5a105a32de42bf8ea2989058213a7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Benjamin Nagengast
- Renato Gil Gomes Carvalho
- Sylvia Beyer
- E. Hengel
- Ulrich Trautwein
- Jenna Cambria
- David C. Geary
- Gijsbert Stoet
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Benjamin Nagengast
- Arielle Bonneville-Roussy
- Ulrich Trautwein
- P. Evans
- Herbert W. Marsh
- Gijsbert Stoet
- T. Bouffard
- Jenna Cambria
Citations in the corpus
- The role of spatial, verbal, numerical, and general reasoning abilities in complex word problem solving for young female and male adults (2020, background): “Another pattern of results is that a male advantage in mathematics typically emerges on standardized tests, whereas differences in favor of females appear when the outcome criteria are school grades (Halpern et al. 2007; O’Dea et al. 2018; Voyer and Voyer 2014).”
- Maximizing Gender Equality by Minimizing Course Choice Options? Effects of Obligatory Coursework in Math on Gender Differences in STEM (2017, background): “…no or only slight differences in math achievement between young women and men in high school (e.g., Hyde, Lindberg, Linn, Ellis, & Williams, 2008; Voyer & Voyer, 2014), whereas others have indicated that such differences still exist and that the magnitude of the differences between young men and…”
- Girls get smart, boys get smug: Historical changes in gender differences in math, literacy, and academic social comparison and achievement (2017, neutral): “…differences in achievement (Falch, Torberg, & Naper, 2013; Hyde & Mertz, 2009; Lietz & Petra, 2006; Machin & McNally, 2005; Machin & Pekkarinen, 2008; Marsh & Yeung, 1998; Reilly, Neumann, & Andrews, 2015; Voyer & Voyer, 2014) as would be hypothesised by rational choice and assimilation theories.”
- Sex differences in academic strengths contribute to gender segregation in education and occupation: A longitudinal examination of 167,776 individuals (2017, neutral): “When it comes to sex differences, academic performance is typically higher among women, in spite of cognitive sex differences favoring either men or women (Voyer & Voyer, 2014).”
- Motivation and coping with the stress of assessment: Gender differences in outcomes for university students (2017, background): “Yet, in many educational domains, women tend to outperform men, and to show greater intentions to persist at university, than men (Smith & Naylor, 2001; Voyer & Voyer, 2014).”
- Helping and Hindering Undergraduate Women’s STEM Motivation: Experiences With STEM Encouragement, STEM-Related Gender Bias, and Sexual Harassment (2018, background): “During high school and college, average gender differences in scholastic achievement in science or math are either negligible or favor girls and women (Voyer & Voyer, 2014).”
- Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality (2015, result): “The stability and magnitude of these differences are vigorously debated, et). although a recent meta-analysis of sex differences in school grades from1914–2011 concluded that the gap remained stable (Voyer & Voyer, 2014).”
- Stereotype manipulation effects on math and spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. (2016, background): “…of gender differences in math performance reflect such small effects that they have been interpreted as non-existent (Hyde, Lindberg, Linn, Ellis, & Williams, 2008; Lindberg, Hyde, Petersen, & Linn, 2010), or as even favoring females when considering school grades (Voyer & Voyer, 2014).”
- Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: A meta-analytic review. (2020, background): “Academic achievement, interpersonal skills, mental health issues, and healthy living are all known to differ in magnitude between boys and girls (Bauman et al., 2012; Polanczyk, Salum, Sugaya, Caye, & Rohde, 2015; Voyer & Voyer, 2014).”
- Publishing while Female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. (2017, background): “(Unrewarded) Higher quality 2 Female students earn better grades (Voyer and Voyer, 2014).2 Female auditors are more accurate and efficient (Chung and Monroe, 2001; O’Donnell and Johnson, 2001; Niskanen et al., 2011; Ittonen et al., 2013).2 Congresswomen secure more federal funding for their…”
- Gender differences in the relationship between academic procrastination, satifaction with academic life and academic performance (2017, background): “…previous studies have revealed inconsistent findings about gender differences in procrastination, there is evidence regarding gender differences in academic achievement among undergraduate students (Chapel et al. 2005; Dayıo ğ lu & Türük-A ş ık, 2007; Khwaileh & Zaza, 2011; Voyer & Voyer, 2014).”