Gijsbert Stoet

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology · 2010–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 37 researchers and is trusted by 10 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Gijsbert Stoet trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Anne Treisman
  2. W. Viechtbauer
  3. R. Dennis Cook
  4. D. Ames
  5. S. Ceci
  6. Hannah‐Hanh D. Nguyen
  7. Nicole Else-Quest
  8. S. Spencer
  9. Luigi Guiso
  10. T. Schmader

Who trusts Gijsbert Stoet overall

  1. Aitor Egurtzegi
  2. Steve Stewart-Williams
  3. Damián E. Blasi
  4. L. Halsey
  5. Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
  6. I. Laka
  7. Vasiliki Pitsia
  8. Martin Meyer
  9. Randi A. Doyle
  10. David C. Geary

Papers from Gijsbert Stoet's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Gijsbert Stoet trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. A Threatening Intellectual Environment: Why Females Are Susceptible to Experiencing Problem-Solving Deficits in the Presence of Males (Psychology Science)
  2. Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  3. Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance
  4. Gender Identification Moderates Stereotype Threat Effects on Women's Math Performance ☆ ☆☆ ★
  5. Alleviating women’s mathematics stereotype threat through salience of group achievements
  6. Female Role Models: Protecting Women’s Math Test Performance
  7. Blatant Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance: Self-Handicapping as a Strategic Means to Cope with Obtrusive Negative Performance Expectations
  8. The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: a review of possible mechanisms. (Psychological bulletin)
  9. Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  10. Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. (Psychological bulletin)

Their papers