Overlap of Self, Ingroup, and Outgroup: Pictorial Measures of Self-Categorization

By Thomas W. Schubert, S. Otten. 2002

367 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0ee7cda43268a78a659ae0288c2418157039785

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

When Terror Hits Home: Identity Fused Americans Who Saw Boston Bombing Victims as “Family” Provided Aid (2015, methodology): “…relationship of the personal and group identity, the measure resembled other measures developed to capture interpersonal closeness (Aron, Aron, & Smollan, 1992), selfcategorization (Schubert & Otten, 2002), and in-group identification (Coats, Smith, Claypool, & Banner, 2000; Tropp & Wright, 2001).”
Identity fusion: the interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. (2009, background): “The scale is a modified version of the one developed by Schubert and Otten (2002).”
An organizing framework for collective identity: articulation and significance of multidimensionality. (2004, background): “It is important to keep in mind that pictorial measures may be especially sensitive to variations in context: As Schubert and Otten (2002) pointed out, the interpretation of their OSIO scale depends in part on the intergroup context.”
When Group Memberships are Negative: The Concept, Measurement, and Behavioral Implications of Psychological Disidentification (2014, methodology): “We expanded the pictorial measure “inclusion of ingroup in the self” (Tropp & Wright, 2001) / “individual ingroup overlap” (Schubert & Otten, 2002) / “identity fusion” (e.g., Swann, Gómez, Seyle, Morales, & Huici, 2009) to a measure “inclusion-exclusion of ingroup from the self” by adding four…”
Justice through consensus: Shared identity and the preference for a restorative notion of justice (2010, background): “In addition, a 7-point Venn diagrammeasure assessed the degree to which participants perceived an overlap in their own identity and the university identity (Schubert & Otten, 2002; Tropp & Wright, 2001).”
Social Projection to Ingroups and Outgroups: A Review and Meta-Analysis (2005, neutral): “A further testimony to the robustness of the differential effect is that alternative types of measures yield convergent re - sults ( see Allen & Wilder , 1979 ; Schubert & Otten , 2002 ; Wilder , 1984 , for examples ) .”
When group membership gets personal: a theory of identity fusion. (2012, background): “, & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context.”
How Moving Together Binds Us Together: The Social Consequences of Interpersonal Entrainment and Group Processes (2019, methodology): “Self-other overlap is intimately linked to group processes, and measures of overlap are used as indicators of one’s relation to a group (Schubert & Otten, 2002).”
More than meets the eye: The role of subordinates' self-perceptions in leader categorization processes☆ (2011, background): “…for instance, inclusion of others in self (Aron, Aron, & Smollan, 1992), organizational identification (Bergami & Bagozzi, 2000; Shamir & Kark, 2004), or general selfcategorization (Schubert & Otten, 2002) – all of which yield congruent validity with more extensive verbal counterpart scales.”
Does synchrony promote generalized prosociality? (2014, methodology): “This questionnaire comprised adapted measures of the IOS, measuring felt closeness to one’s own group and to the other group (Aron et al., 1992; Schubert & Otten, 2002; Swann, Gomez, Seyle, Morales, & Huici, 2009).”
The conflict of harmony: Intergroup contact, commonality and political solidarity between minority groups (2012, background): “…depicting the “relations between Blacks and Latino/as.” Specifically, each pictorial representation had two circles along a continuum of distance, Blacks represented by a circle at one side and the other circle representing Latino/as on the other end of the continuum (Schubert & Otten, 2002).”