The conflict of harmony: Intergroup contact, commonality and political solidarity between minority groups

By Demis E. Glasford, Justine Calcagno. 2012

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Field Experiments on Discrimination (2016, result): “A few recent studies (Saguy et al., 2009; Dovidio et al., 2009; Glasford and Calcagno, 2012) provide lab results consistent with this observational data, with minority group members under the contact condition appearing lulled into believing that the majority”
“We for She”: Mobilising men and women to act in solidarity for gender equality (2018, background): “Eight items assessed participants’ collective action intentions (α = .89; adapted from Glasford & Calcagno, 2012, and van Zomeren, Spears, Fischer, & Leach, 2004; e.g., “Talk to male [female] colleagues about this issue,” “Participate in a demonstration promoting flexible work options”).”
Stigma-Based Solidarity (2016, background): “For instance, Latinos who report higher levels of quality contact with Whites are less likely to express solidarity with Blacks, even if primed to focus on the groups’ shared disadvantaged status (Glasford & Calcagno, 2012).”