Safeguarding Interorganizational Performance and Continuity Under Ex Post Opportunism

By Sandy D. Jap, Erin Anderson. Management Sciences, 2003

715 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce8b9a35aa476c7be877ca36cd7830c15d9a0e24

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: A social capital perspective⋆ (2011, background): “Furthermore, the establishment of congruent goals can guide the nature, direction, and magnitude of the efforts of the parties (Jap and Anderson, 2003).”
Passive and Active Opportunism in Interorganizational Exchange (2013, background): “(reliability = .79, M = 1.90, SD = .93) adapted from Jap and Anderson (2003) When a problem occurs, how often will this firm do the following?”
Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations (2010, background): “The second is what Williamson (1985: 58) terms behavioral uncertainty regarding whether and when suppliers will behave opportunistically (Jap and Anderson, 2003; Sutcliffe and Zaheer, 1998).”
Opportunism in Inter-firm Exchanges in Emerging Markets[1] (2006, neutral): “Thus, in the course of cooperation, each party still emphasizes its own gains from © 2006 The Author Journal compilation © Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2006 specific projects in which the parties' needs are frequently not compatible (Jap and Anderson, 2003; Jones, Hesterly, and Borgatti, 1997).”
The Impact of Online Reverse Auction Design on Buyer–Supplier Relationships (2007, methodology): “Jap (2002) provides a conceptual overview of the differences between online reverse auctions in the marketplace and both physical auctions and those of the theoretical literature, as well as the conditions, structure, and evaluation of online reverse auctions.”
The interaction effect of relational norms and agent cooperativeness on opportunism in buyer–supplier relationships (2010, neutral): “The topic of opportunism is one that has been studied in various buyer–supplier contexts (e.g., Carson et al., 2006; Jap and Anderson, 2003).”