The two faces of transformational leadership: empowerment and dependency.
By R. Kark, Boas Shamir, Gilad Chen. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003
1,454 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb29248cb55e2454a9666fbbf9f236d3a8068e80
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Fred Walumbwa
- Bruce J. Avolio
- Weichun Zhu
- James Avey
- O. Epitropaki
- D. van Knippenberg
- Chad A. Hartnell
- Peng Wang
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Fred Walumbwa
- Bruce J. Avolio
- D. van Knippenberg
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- Alexander Newman
- Arnold B. Bakker
- James Avey
- O. Epitropaki
In Strategy and Management
- Fred Walumbwa
- Bruce J. Avolio
- James Avey
- Weichun Zhu
- Heike Bruch
- O. Epitropaki
- D. van Knippenberg
- Peng Wang
Citations in the corpus
- Toward a Contingency Model of Leadership and Psychological Empowerment: When Should Self-Leadership Be Encouraged? (2005, background): “Kark, Shamir, and Chen (2003) found that transformational leadership was positively related to follower dependence as mediated by personal identification with the leader.”
- Charismatic leadership, change and innovation in an R&D organization (2009, background): “Leaders influence how team members perceive themselves and they have the potential to influence their follower's sense of belonging ( Kark et al. , 2003”
- Transformational Teaching and Adolescent Self‐Determined Motivation, Self‐Efficacy, and Intentions to Engage in Leisure Time Physical Activity: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Trial (2011, background): “Thus, based on theory (Bass, 1998) and previous research with adults within occupational settings (Dvir et al., 2002; Kark et al., 2003), we predicted that school students in the intervention condition would display higher levels of self-efficacy beliefs to complete the requisite within-class…”
- Linking leadership empowerment behavior to employee attitudes and behavioral intentions: testing the mediating role of psychological empowerment (2011, background): “transformational and charismatic leadership ( Kark, Shamir & Chen, 2003; Thomas &”
- Transformational leadership, adaptability, and job crafting:the moderating role of organizational identification. (2017, background): “It has been found that transformational leaders delegate more power to employees (e.g., Kark, Shamir, & Chen, 2003).”
- Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions (2008, background): “Kark, Shamir, and Chen (2003) found that the transformational leadership behaviors of midlevel bank managers predicted employees’ identification with their manager, which in turn predicted their dependence on their manager.”
- Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda (2004, background): “Adding further evidence from the field, Kark et al. (2003) found that transformational leadership was positively related to organizationbased self-esteem (i.e., self-esteem specific to the organizational setting).”
- MODELING HOW TO GROW: AN INDUCTIVE EXAMINATION OF HUMBLE LEADER BEHAVIORS, CONTINGENCIES, AND OUTCOMES (2012, background): “…enables a leader to temper visionary, charismatic, or transformational approaches to influencing others so as to prevent the dark side of such approaches (i.e., overidentification [Kark et al., 2003]; “pseudo-” transformational leadership [Morris et al., 2005]; or abuse of power [Conger, 1990]).”