Work-Home Interference, Job Stressors, and Employee Health in a Longitudinal Perspective

By Marianne Peeters, J. de Jonge, P. Janssen, Sj. Linden. 2004

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8038c355d62bf6fde358208df86351a7af9d478

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. E. Hughes
2. Olaf Gjerløw Aasland
3. E. Falkum
4. Ellen Melbye Langballe
5. Siw Tone Innstrand
6. K. Parkes
7. Tareq Lubbadeh

In Social Psychology

1. Geir Arild Espnes
2. E. Hughes
3. Olaf Gjerløw Aasland
4. E. Falkum
5. Ellen Melbye Langballe
6. Siw Tone Innstrand
7. K. Parkes
8. Tareq Lubbadeh

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Geir Arild Espnes
2. E. Hughes
3. Olaf Gjerløw Aasland
4. E. Falkum
5. Ellen Melbye Langballe
6. Siw Tone Innstrand
7. K. Parkes
8. Michael Quinlan

Citations in the corpus

• Positive and negative work–family interaction and burnout: A longitudinal study of reciprocal relations (2008, background): “The reverse causation approach has received very little attention until now (Peeters et al, 2004 ), and regards work–family interaction as an outcome variable.”
• Work hours and well-being: The roles of work-time control and work–family interference (2007, methodology): “The effort-recovery (E-R) model (Meijman & Mulder, 1998 ) has been used in recent studies to explain the mediating role of WIF in the relationship between work characteristics (eg, work hours and job demands) and well-being (eg, Geurts, Kompier, Roxburgh, & Houtman, 2003 ; Janssen, Peeters, de Jon”