Associations among the Big Five, emotional responses, and coping with acute stress

By J. Penley, J. Tomaka. 2002

499 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c527db0cbdcb6fbbf5b103dc7e8791113d197704

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Situational and dispositional coping: an examination of their relation to personality, cognitive appraisals, and psychological distress (2004, background): “In fact, as previously demonstrated and as observed here, personality traits are linked both to coping styles (Ferguson, 2001; Watson & Hubbard, 1996) and to cognitive appraisals (Penley & Tomaka, 2002).”
A Time-Lagged Study of the Relationship Between Big Five Personality and Ethical Ideology (2016, background): “…impact of the Big Five personality traits on job performance (Barrick & Mount, 1991), job satisfaction (Judge, Heller, & Mount, 2002), job stress (Penley & Tomaka, 2002), intent to leave (Mobley, Griffeth, Hand, & Meglino, 1979), customer relationship management (Haq, Ramay, Rehman, & Jam,…”
The role of neuroticism on psychological and physiological stress responses. (2004, background): “However, Penley and Tomaka (2002) found conscientiousness was related to less threat.”
The joint effects of personality and job scope on in-role performance, citizenship behaviors, and creativity (2010, background): “Neuroticism Associated with negative emotions (Penley and Tomaka, 2002), people high in neuroticism are self-pitying, anxious, less trusting, depressed, and nervous (McCrae and John, 1992).”
Momentary work recovery: The role of within-day work breaks (2009, background): “…low on Extraversion have a general positive appraisal tendency (Gallagher, 1990; Hemenover & Dienstbier, 1996); perceive that they have high and adequate coping abilities (Penley & Tomaka, 2002); experience more positive emotions and experience daily stressors as challenges (Gallagher, 1990).”
Neuroticism, daily hassles, and depressive symptoms: An examination of moderating and mediating effects (2007, background): “Uehara et al. (1999), Penley & Tomaka (2002), Endler & Parker (1990) David & Suls (1999) and Bolger (1990) all found that N was correlated with the use of emotionfocused coping techniques such as self-blame, wishful thinking, escapist fantasy, and passivity.”
Technostress creators and job outcomes: theorising the moderating influence of personality traits (2015, background): “Prior organisational stress literature has shown the salient role of individual personality traits in influencing the experienced stress and its effect on related job outcomes (see Code & LanganFox, 2001; Penley & Tomaka, 2002; Grant & Langan-Fox, 2006; Carver & Connor-Smith, 2010).”
Sociodemographic and Psychological Correlates of Compliance with the COVID-19 Public Health Measures in France (2020, background): “This finding could be attributed to the tendency of neurotic individuals to appraise that their capacity for coping with a threatening stimulus is low, which may lead to inaction (Penley and Tomaka, 2002).”
Relations between personality and coping: a meta-analysis. (2007, background): “Personality should also be strongly linked to dispositional coping because personality influences the type of events experienced, which in turn influence typical coping (Bouchard, Guillemette, & Landry-Leger, 2004; Penley & Tomaka, 2002).”
Career Resilience: An Integrated Review of the Empirical Literature (2017, background): “Individuals vary in their capacities to cope with life problems, and there is a long history of using personality traits to explain these differences (Penley & Tomaka, 2002).”
A multi-method examination of the effects of mindfulness on stress attribution, coping, and emotional well-being (2009, background): “Both are relevant because they have demonstrated high relations (neuroticism: r = � 0.56, p Penley & Tomaka, 2002 ), avoidant and active ...”