Employee development and voluntary turnover: Testing the employability paradox

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The mediating role of psychological distress between ostracism, work engagement, and turnover intentions: An analysis in the Cypriot hospitality context (2021, background): “8 significant association between internal employability and turnover intention (Baranchenko, Xie, Lin, Lau, & Ma, 2020; Nelissen et al., 2017; Lu, Sun, & Du, 2016).”
The winner takes it all, the loser has to fall: Provoking the agency perspective in employability research (2018, unknown): “Rather ironically, another illustration is studies probing the employability management paradox: Employer investments in employability are beneficial for the organisation, for example, in productivity gain, but also risky when employable workers are more likely to quit (Acikgoz et al., 2016; De Cuyp”
#Trending topics in careers: a review and future research agenda (2017, background): “Recent research on the employability management paradox (e.g. Nelissen et al., 2017) has started to shed more light on the benefits and the potential trade-off effects of employability, yet a strong understanding of these dynamics is still lacking.”