Consumer Privacy: Balancing Economic and Justice Considerations

By Mary J. Culnan, R. Bies. 2003

802 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c47563f28b85704a2750d28b5ccf47a0f84e1512

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Information Systems

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Consumer online privacy concerns and responses: a power–responsibility equilibrium perspective (2007, background): “For example, the low level Policy scenario asked respondents to consider a situation where they visited a Web site that did not display a Fair Information Practices notice, whereas the high level scenario involved a Web site with a comprehensive and highly visible Fair Information Practices notice (”
Information Privacy Concerns: Linking Individual Perceptions with Institutional Privacy Assurances (2011, positive): “It has been suggested that the firms’ provisions of privacy notice to consumers increase consumers’ perceived privacy control (Culnan & Bies, 2003; Milne & Culnan, 2004).”
Privacy Concerns Versus Desire for Interpersonal Awareness in Driving the Use of Self-Disclosure Technologies: The Case of Instant Messaging in Two Cultures (2011, background): “The concept of “second exchange” has been introduced in Culnan and Bies [15] to explain the privacy calculus, whereby consumers’ personal information is given in return for value or benefits.”
Personalization versus Privacy: An Empirical Examination of the Online Consumer’s Dilemma (2005, background): “This argument is consistent with Laufer and Wolfe’s [35] suggestion that consumers engage in a cost-beneﬁt analysis in dealing with privacy and Culnan and Bie’s [14] notion of “privacy calculus,” where consumers assess the outcomes they receive when sharing information with organizations.”
The Value of Privacy Assurance: An Exploratory Field Experiment (2007, background): “Trust propensity may affect subjects’ confidence in our partner firm and hence their extent of disclosure in the experiment (Culnan and Bies 2003).”
Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review (2011, methodology): “6Privacy is frequently defined in IS and many branches of social science research in phrases such as “the ability of individuals to control the terms under which their personal information is acquired and used” (Culnan and Bies 2003, p. 326), which is adapted from Westin’s (1967) definition.”
Counteracting the Negative Effect of Form Auto-completion on the Privacy Calculus (2013, background): “Several researchers have since used the term “privacy calculus” to investigate antecedents of information disclosure (Culnan and Armstrong 1999; Culnan and Bies 2003; Dinev and Hart 2006; Hann et al. 2007; Keith et al. 2011; Li et al. 2010; Milne and Thirty Fourth International Conference on…”
Understanding Privacy Online: Development of a Social Contract Approach to Privacy (2016, background): “2011), a privacy calculus (Culnan and Armstrong 1999; Dinev and Hart 2006), or a second exchange (Culnan and Bies 2003), all of which assume individuals relinquish privacy in order to gain something in return.”
The role of affect and cognition on online consumers' decision to disclose personal information to unfamiliar online vendors (2011, background): “Online companies are responsible for protecting the information by implementing privacy policies based on the four basic elements of fair information practices: notice, choice, access and security [20].”
Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model (2004, methodology): “This collection factor is grounded on SC's principle of distributive justice, which relates to "the perceived fairness of outcomes that one receives" (Culnan and Bies 2003, p. 328).”
Internet Users' Information Privacy-Protective Responses: A Taxonomy and a Nomological Model (2008, methodology): “The fact that well-designed information procedures are present does not guarantee awareness by users of how their personal information will be handled, which means online companies should undertake to ensure that their customers are aware of the procedures (Culnan and Bies 2003).”