Internet Users' Information Privacy-Protective Responses: A Taxonomy and a Nomological Model

By Jai-Yeol Son, Sung S. Kim. MIS Q., 2008

639 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d327e727ae82aad3981c12b5ef5882c55e65cc1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Information Systems and Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Regulatory Focus Theory, Trust, and Privacy Concern (2009, background): “…the company directly (cf. Sheehan and Hoy 1999); spreading negative word-of-mouth through Internet chat rooms, blogs, newsgroups, and online forums (cf. Culnan and Armstrong 1999); and sending negative comments through instant messaging (e.g., via MSN messenger, SMS; cf. Son and Kim 2008).”
Adoption of Electronic Health Records in the Presence of Privacy Concerns: The Elaboration Likelihood Model and Individual Persuasion (2009, background): “…as a medium for transferring information (Dinev and Hart 2006; Hui et al. 2007; Malhotra et al. 2004), when information is gathered and used in an organizational context (Smith et al. 1996; Stewart and Segars 2002), and how individuals respond to threats to electronic privacy (Son and Kim 2008).”
Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon (2017, background): “Son and Kim (2008) provide a taxonomy of Information Privacy-Protective Responses (IPPRs) that includes the following six types of IPPRs: refusal (i.”
Method Variance and Marker Variables: A Review and Comprehensive CFA Marker Technique (2010, methodology): “…method variance while also reporting results of theory testing with latent variable structural equation techniques include Li, Hess, and Valacich (2008), Lui (2009), Son and Kim (2008), Sun, Bhattacherjee, and Ma (2009), Wang, Bradford, Xu, and Weitz (2008), and Yang, Mossholder, and Peng (2009).”
The Role of Push-Pull Technology in Privacy Calculus: The Case of Location-Based Services (2009, background): “In some analyses of identifying dimensions of justice in the privacy context [27, 66], interactional justice was considered as the third component of justice besides procedural justice and distributive justice.”
The role of affect and cognition on online consumers' decision to disclose personal information to unfamiliar online vendors (2011, background): “in this research, we aim to respond to the recent call for examining privacy decision-making taking into account situation-specific factors [45,57,63].”
Information Privacy Concerns: Linking Individual Perceptions with Institutional Privacy Assurances (2011, positive): “Consistent with recent operationalization of privacy concerns in the literature (e.g., Dinev & Hart, 2006b; Son & Kim, 2008), we measured this construct with seven-point Likert scale items that we directly adapted from Dinev and Hart (2006a).”